2011 IEEE Radiation Effects Data Workshop 2011
DOI: 10.1109/redw.2010.6062530
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FASTRAD 3.2: Radiation Shielding Tool with a New Monte Carlo Module

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[52] The FASTRAD toolkit [e.g., Pourrouquet et al, 2011] was used to import the CAD geometries of the spacecraft components and instruments surrounding the GRS ( Figure A3) into the Geant4 application to reproduce the upper third of the spacecraft. With this model, the efficiency of the GRS was characterized for incident angles ranging over 0 < q D < 130 in a 2 Â 2 grid in q D and 8 D space.…”
Section: A3 Modeled Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[52] The FASTRAD toolkit [e.g., Pourrouquet et al, 2011] was used to import the CAD geometries of the spacecraft components and instruments surrounding the GRS ( Figure A3) into the Geant4 application to reproduce the upper third of the spacecraft. With this model, the efficiency of the GRS was characterized for incident angles ranging over 0 < q D < 130 in a 2 Â 2 grid in q D and 8 D space.…”
Section: A3 Modeled Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As part of the radiation engineering activities of OPTOS mission, a full radiation tolerance analysis was carried out. This analysis included the characterization of the expected high-energy particle fluxes during the mission and a detailed simulation study on the propagation of such fluxes through a full 3D model of the platform (with the FASTRAD [15] tool), which considered the main shielding structures and subsystems. The final aim was to provide a realistic estimation of the radiation levels intraspacecraft in the form of particle spectral fluxes and cumulated ionizing and nonionizing doses at selected locations and components.…”
Section: Computer Radiation Assurancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those surveyed considered the effects of TID/DDD on the system by using an environmental flux model such as AP9/AE9 or AP8/AE8 along with transport models such as NOVICE [ Jordan , ] or FASTRAD [ Pourrouquet et al ., ] to predict mission TID/DDD. Most will also use tools such as CREME [ Tylka et al ., ] or CREME‐MC [ Weller et al ., ; Mendenhall and Weller , ] to ensure that SEU rates due to GCR and trapped protons as well as peak solar proton event fluxes are within the expected and accepted limits.…”
Section: Main Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%