2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2020.109317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fat tails in leading indicators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the BAA spread (which is mostly used as a leading indicator in this context, i.e., as a predictor for the real economy), we find that even after controlling for time variation in the second moment of the innovations, there is some scope for modeling non‐Gaussian behavior (cf. Kiss & Österholm, 2020). These findings are basically unchanged whether we consider univariate, bivariate, or trivariate specifications.…”
Section: Empirical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the BAA spread (which is mostly used as a leading indicator in this context, i.e., as a predictor for the real economy), we find that even after controlling for time variation in the second moment of the innovations, there is some scope for modeling non‐Gaussian behavior (cf. Kiss & Österholm, 2020). These findings are basically unchanged whether we consider univariate, bivariate, or trivariate specifications.…”
Section: Empirical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As pointed out already by Engle (1982), this could be caused by time‐varying volatility of innovations. However, there is also evidence that the innovations affecting the variables can benefit from being modeled with heavy tails (Brunnermeier et al, 2021; Chiu et al, 2017; Karlsson & Mazur, 2020; Kiss & Österholm, 2020; Liu, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3 Fagiolo et al (2008) found the Laplace distribution useful when modelling the fat tails of GDP growth rates. The Student-t distribution has been used more widely in the empirical literature; see, for example, Cúrdia et al (2014); Clark and Ravazzolo (2015); Cross and Poon (2016); and Kiss and Österholm (2020).…”
Section: Institutional Review Boardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider two aspects of non-Gaussianity. The first of these is heavy tails (or "fat tails")-an issue that takes its starting point in the observation that many economic variables seem to experience large swings more frequently than what one would expect if the shocks hitting the economy are drawn from a Gaussian distribution; see, for example, Fagiolo et al (2008), Ascari et al (2015), Cross and Poon (2016), Liu (2019) and Kiss and Österholm (2020). The second aspect is that the unconditional distribution of many variables appears to be characterised by skewness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%