2013
DOI: 10.1177/1358863x13483865
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fatal anaphylactoid reaction associated with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Abstract: Acute systemic (anaphylaxis and anaphylactoid) reactions have been well described in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Both necrotizing and non-necrotizing skin lesions at heparin injection sites have been reported and may occur in 10-20% of patients with HIT. We report herein a patient treated with subcutaneous enoxaparin sodium who developed non-necrotizing erythematous skin lesions at enoxaparin sodium injection sites. A subsequent intravenous bolus of unfractionated heparin produced a f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Venous thrombosis is more common (17% - 55%) than arterial thrombosis, manifesting (3% - 10%) as deep venous thromboses/pulmonary embolism, skin necrosis at the site of heparin, limb gangrene, and organ ischemia [3, 9-10]. Anaphylaxis that can be fatal has been reported [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Venous thrombosis is more common (17% - 55%) than arterial thrombosis, manifesting (3% - 10%) as deep venous thromboses/pulmonary embolism, skin necrosis at the site of heparin, limb gangrene, and organ ischemia [3, 9-10]. Anaphylaxis that can be fatal has been reported [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been some cases reported in the literature that patients with heparin exposure who developed thrombocytopenia and signs of thrombosis (such as non-necrotising lesions at the site of subcutaneous injection of UFH or LMWH) developed anaphylactoid reactions with subsequent heparin exposure 11 13. However, either due to lack of documentation or lack of recognition of these clinical signs (skin lesions), as related to HIT, these patients received repeated exposure to heparin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A subset of type II HIT, rapid onset HIT, found in 25% of cases, involves the development of thrombocytopenia within 24 hours of re-exposure due to circulating antibodies from recent heparin use within the last 90 days. It is usually complicated by an anaphylactoid reaction during the 30 minutes after a heparin bolus [4]. Delay in treatment of HIT may result in a 5-10% daily risk of thrombosis, amputation, or death [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%