2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.12.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fate and distribution modelling of metals in life cycle impact assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could promote a more structured and consistent approach to LCA and decision making. Because decision analysis is in essence a systems tool, it is consistent with the systemic intent of LCA (Strandesen et al 2007). …”
Section: Literature Review On Applications Of CML and Eco-indicatormentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This could promote a more structured and consistent approach to LCA and decision making. Because decision analysis is in essence a systems tool, it is consistent with the systemic intent of LCA (Strandesen et al 2007). …”
Section: Literature Review On Applications Of CML and Eco-indicatormentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This partition coefficient relates the contaminants partition in the liquid and solid phases, besides controlling their distribution and influencing the bioavailability of metals [14]. Some researchers [15,16] suggest that when partition coefficient values are high, the total amount of contaminants adsorbed by the suspended particulate matter is usually lower than the concentration in the dissolved phase.…”
Section: Dam Wall S9mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fate factor FF j,i,s (d) typically expresses the mass of substance s in compartment j resulting from the emission to compartment i, while the effect factor EF j,s (PAF m 3 day kg −1 ) expresses the ecotoxic effect that can be expected in compartment j as a result of an increase in the amount of substance s. In recognition of the influence that speciation has on the environmental fate of metal compounds, several studies have addressed how to include this in the calculation of FF for metals, e.g. Bhavsar et al (2004), Bhavsar et al (2008) and Strandesen et al (2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the use of total dissolved concentrations may be justified for non-dissociating organic pollutants, the toxicity of metals in water thus depends on the concentrations and activities of specific chemical forms (species) of the metal rather than on the total dissolved concentrations (e.g. Heijerick et al 2003;Strandesen et al 2007). The speciation pattern of metals is influenced by the overall composition of the solution (synthetic or natural), in particular, properties like pH, hardness, ionic strength and the presence of complexing ligands such as inorganic ions, EDTA (in synthetic test media) and naturally occurring dissolved organic matter (DOM) expressed as dissolved organic carbon (DOC).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%