FATHERS, SONS, AND THE STATE: Discipline and Punishment in a Wolof Hinterland

Abstract

This essay builds on fieldwork in rural Senegal to examine three cases in which elder household heads called on gendarmes to physically discipline rebellious youths. These cases, which revolved around harsh acts of corporal punishment, invite inquiry into common assumptions about African families and states. The first assumption is the common dichotomy drawn between African youths, portrayed as modern and menacing, and African elders, portrayed as “traditional” and hence benign. The second assumption is the dichotomy drawn between the African family, conceived as solidary and nurturing, and the African state, conceived as alien and predatory. In examining these cases of discipline and punishment, this essay reveals the ever‐shifting power relations that link Wolof household heads, dependent junior males, and state agents, and simultaneously introduces new questions about the morality of farmer–state relations and generational conflict. My analysis reveals the spatial geography of Senegal's youth crisis, which takes different forms in rural and urban locales. The anxiety of rural patriarchs is fed by a fear‐mongering media obsessed with youthful anarchy in the cities, and a long‐standing political rhetoric about the threat of rural out‐migration. Elder men in the countryside, who experience diminishing household authority under neoliberalism, make proactive efforts to keep the urban youth crisis at bay. They seek to augment their domestic power by reestablishing links with a state that has long bolstered patriarchy but whose power is currently in decline. By lending patriarchs their coercive force, gendarmes attempt to accomplish through private, indirect means, what the postcolonial state is unable to do: maintain social order by reining in disruptive youths. The harsh disciplinary measures that gendarmes employ are not alien to Wolof culture, but integral to Wolof conceptions of child rearing.

THE HEADLESS HORSEMAN OF CENTRAL INDIA: Sovereignty at Varying Thresholds of Life

“…Perhaps future work, including my own, 3 will show the relevance of the Mitra‐Varuna political theology for anthropological ideas of secularized power. For now I only hint that this characterization of sovereignty illuminates seemingly contradictory tendencies, a potentiality recent authors describe as “compassion and repression” (Fassin 2005), or “sympathy” (Rutherford 2009) and “coercion” (Perry 2009) as (bipolar) tendencies of sovereign power.…”

Force Signs: Ideologies of Corporal Discipline in Academia and the Marshall Islands

“…Interactions between all of these signs in Jajikon link force to age, authority, and caregiving (see also Bledsoe 1990;Ember and Ember 2005;Kavapalu 1993;Korbin 1990;Last 2000;Morton 1996;Nutter 2013;Perry 2009). In the Jajikonian age hierarchy, older individuals care for those who are younger.…”

Care or Neglect?: Corporal Discipline Reform in a Rural Moroccan Classroom

“…As cultural anthropologists have demonstrated, however, the way in which child abuse is conceptualized and corporal punishment is practiced does vary considerably across cultural and historical contexts, as does the meaning that children and their caretakers ascribe to these practices (Fassin and Reichman ; Hacking ; Korbin ; Scheper‐Hughes ). Recent work on intergenerational practices of corporal discipline, for example, has demonstrated the importance and value that people in varied cultural contexts place on painful physical coercion and the positive moral valance of these practices for those who both mete out and receive such discipline (Archambault ; Kavapalu ; Last ; Lempert ; Lyons ; Perry ). These bodies of literature emphasize cultural variation in what constitutes child abuse and how these practices articulate with larger social processes.…”