1970
DOI: 10.5209/psic.55811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fatiga por compasión entre profesionales sanitarios de oncología y cuidados paliativos

Abstract: Recibido: 5 de octubre de 2016 / Aceptado: 15 de abril de 2017 Resumen. Objetivo: Conocer la evidencia sobre los factores relacionados con la fatiga por compasión entre profesionales sanitarios de oncología y cuidados paliativos. Metodología: Revisión sistemática. Estrategia de búsqueda en bases de datos: Pubmed, Cuiden, Cinahl y Psycinfo. Resultados: La fatiga por compasión ha sido relacionada con el Síndrome de burnout y correlacionada negativamente con la satisfacción por compasión. El nivel de fatiga po… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous review studies have focused their analysis on all palliative care professionals, mixing data from nurses and doctors [22][23][24] and providing limited quantitative data on mean values and prevalence of the syndrome and its related factors [22]. Others have been focused on analyzing compassion fatigue in all professionals of the unit [25] and none have done a meta-analysis to estimate the real impact of burnout in palliative care nurses. Thus, it is interesting to exclusively analyze the influence of burnout in palliative nurses and meta-analytically estimate the prevalence of the syndrome as has been done in other units.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous review studies have focused their analysis on all palliative care professionals, mixing data from nurses and doctors [22][23][24] and providing limited quantitative data on mean values and prevalence of the syndrome and its related factors [22]. Others have been focused on analyzing compassion fatigue in all professionals of the unit [25] and none have done a meta-analysis to estimate the real impact of burnout in palliative care nurses. Thus, it is interesting to exclusively analyze the influence of burnout in palliative nurses and meta-analytically estimate the prevalence of the syndrome as has been done in other units.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The care of people can imply what has been called, compassion satisfaction (CS): the positivity resulting from caring (Phelps, Lloyd, Creamer, & Forbes, 2009), taken as the "ability to receive gratification from caregiving" (Simon, Pryce & Klemmack, 2006) or as the selflessness and positive feelings resulting from the ability to help. Within the job performance of healthcare professionals, CS is associated with an understanding of the healing process, an internal self-reflexion, a connection with fellowmen, an increased sense of spirituality, and a higher degree of empathy (Hernández García, 2017); it also has its own measuring instrument called the Compassion Fatigue and Satisfaction Test (Stamm, 2010). According to some authors, a proper management of self-compassion helps professionals to reduce stress and prevent burnout (Aranda Auserón et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is necessary for our survival as it allows us to show empathy, which is fundamental to social interaction [ 45 ]. However, it also means that when perceiving pain or distress in others, we may also experience the associated physiological activation [ 46 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compassion fatigue is not uncommon among nurses who regularly care for patients with a life-threatening illness [ 46 ], and it can cause a pervasive decline in their desire, ability and energy to care for others [ 47 ]. The literature indicates that nurses working in oncology are more at risk of suffering compassion fatigue [ 48 ], although a high workload and a lack of support from colleagues and managers are also determining factors [ 49 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%