2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2016.12.111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fatigue behavior of aged and solution treated AZ61 Mg alloy at small length scale using nanoindentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…because of the relatively lower σ concentration and larger indentation–process zone on the contact surface . There was no mandatory sample size requirement in the nanoindentation test, but it was necessary to ensure full contact between the membrane and the substrate glass . Four sets of nanoindentation experimental schemes were designed: Rate‐dependence experiments: The membrane was pressed to a target h of 2000 nm under loading ε rates of 0.001, 0.002, 0.005, and 0.01 second −1 followed a holding time of 20 s and then unloaded with the same rate of loading. σ‐Relaxation experiments: Four peak holding h s (2000, 3000, 4000, and 5000 nm) were applied to the sample at a constant loading stain rate of 0.01 second −1 , and a holding time of 100 s was recorded to measure the changing load ( p ) with time. Creep experiments: The creep behaviors were measured at different holding peak p s (200, 400, 600, and 800 μN), respectively; then, the creep changes with holding time (100 s) were compared. Fatigue experiments: Four loading frequencies (0.0125, 0.125, 0.25, and 0.5 Hz) were adopted within 400 s via a triangle wave‐loading path, and the damage of the material was explored. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…because of the relatively lower σ concentration and larger indentation–process zone on the contact surface . There was no mandatory sample size requirement in the nanoindentation test, but it was necessary to ensure full contact between the membrane and the substrate glass . Four sets of nanoindentation experimental schemes were designed: Rate‐dependence experiments: The membrane was pressed to a target h of 2000 nm under loading ε rates of 0.001, 0.002, 0.005, and 0.01 second −1 followed a holding time of 20 s and then unloaded with the same rate of loading. σ‐Relaxation experiments: Four peak holding h s (2000, 3000, 4000, and 5000 nm) were applied to the sample at a constant loading stain rate of 0.01 second −1 , and a holding time of 100 s was recorded to measure the changing load ( p ) with time. Creep experiments: The creep behaviors were measured at different holding peak p s (200, 400, 600, and 800 μN), respectively; then, the creep changes with holding time (100 s) were compared. Fatigue experiments: Four loading frequencies (0.0125, 0.125, 0.25, and 0.5 Hz) were adopted within 400 s via a triangle wave‐loading path, and the damage of the material was explored. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For bulk materials, a common approach has been multicycle nanoindentation with an incremental load. [26][27][28][29][30][31] The tests were performed with very low maximum numbers of cycles in the range of 10-1000. A dynamic mechanical analysis mode was used to further increase the number of cycles up to 8 Â 10 5 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They measured the drift prior to their experiments at a low load and used the obtained value for the drift correction. [ 26,29 ] Others adjusted the method slightly by extending the holding segment until the thermal drift fell below a certain threshold before starting the cyclic indentation process. [ 25 ] Alternatively, drift monitoring segments were placed at the end of the fatigue test, following cyclic loading of the material, or both approaches were combined and the drift was measured at the beginning and the end.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Loading was, however, limited to 300 cycles. 11 Schmahl et al 12 presented nanofatigue experiments on an Al-Si-Mg alloy with loading up to a much higher cycle number of 10. 5 In contrast to cyclic nanoindentation, a large number of macrofatigue tests has been published for Mg alloy composites, for example, Hassan et al, 8 including Mg alloy-SiC composites, 13,14 and pure Mg nanocomposites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far only one study reports on the nanofatigue behavior of a Mg alloy using nanoindentation. Loading was, however, limited to 300 cycles 11 . Schmahl et al 12 presented nanofatigue experiments on an Al–Si–Mg alloy with loading up to a much higher cycle number of 10 5 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%