2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2013.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fatigue behavior of porous biomaterials manufactured using selective laser melting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
201
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 301 publications
(213 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
12
201
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 2 shows a schematic graph to present the working principle of the SLM [46]. Table 3 provides a summary about the key machine parameters and working conditions via a typical SLM machine, SLM 280 HL [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46]. …”
Section: Selective Laser Melting (Slm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2 shows a schematic graph to present the working principle of the SLM [46]. Table 3 provides a summary about the key machine parameters and working conditions via a typical SLM machine, SLM 280 HL [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46]. …”
Section: Selective Laser Melting (Slm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mechanical fatigue behavior of polymer scaffolds have been barely assessed in the literature 3,4 , despite their large importance in actual applications. The mechanical properties of dry scaffold are not representative of the behavior of the material when immersed in cell culture media or during in vivo experiments, as the porous will be filled with aqueous media and/or growing tissue that will strongly contribute to the scaffold mechanical response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although increasing the controlled porosity reduces the stiffness and provides space for bone ingrowth, fatigue properties may suffer [61]. Therefore, relying on static mechanical tests alone is not sufficient.…”
Section: Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The material properties of struts are needed to be known for characterization, since this information will affect the predicted results. Yavari et al [61] predicted that using the same energy density in all lattice structures would result in the same material properties and that there would be no significant differences between the bulk and strut material properties. Experiments performed by Tsopanos et al [69] indicated a reduction of 74% in the stiffness of struts as compared to bulk.…”
Section: Modelling and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%