2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.coco.2021.100812
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fatigue life prediction of glass fiber reinforced epoxy composites using artificial neural networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, machine learning (ML) based big data driven methods have played an important role in developing a predictive capability for material properties and lightweight design based on extensive experimental evidence [20][21][22][23] . Indeed, support vector machine (SVM), Random-Forest (RF), Gaussian process regression (GPR), shallow neural network (SNN), deep neural network (DNN), Linear regression (LR), and artificial neural networks (ANN) have all been found to make accurate life and crack propagation predictions, based on fatigue-related data for conventionally processed metals and alloys [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] . Regarding AM metals, a variety of ML methods have been employed to predict the mechanical properties, to optimise the AM processing as well as for the online defect detection, as briefly summarized in Table 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, machine learning (ML) based big data driven methods have played an important role in developing a predictive capability for material properties and lightweight design based on extensive experimental evidence [20][21][22][23] . Indeed, support vector machine (SVM), Random-Forest (RF), Gaussian process regression (GPR), shallow neural network (SNN), deep neural network (DNN), Linear regression (LR), and artificial neural networks (ANN) have all been found to make accurate life and crack propagation predictions, based on fatigue-related data for conventionally processed metals and alloys [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] . Regarding AM metals, a variety of ML methods have been employed to predict the mechanical properties, to optimise the AM processing as well as for the online defect detection, as briefly summarized in Table 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A significant group of published papers currently concerns the fatigue of additive manufactured parts 25–27 . ML methods are also often used to predict the fatigue life of non‐metallic materials 28–30 . Sometimes ML methods are used to predict the fatigue life of machines 31–33 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the traditional fatigue test, the test specimen is subjected to cyclic loading until the material fails. Based on the experimental test results, a S – N curve can be made, in which N and S represent the number of fatigue load tests and the material failure stress, respectively. However, the S – N curve does not contain information on the microstructural changes during fatigue, for example, the relationship between the microstructural changes of the material and the number of cycles from the beginning to failure . Another test method put forward was the mechanical loss method, which can obtain more information about the evolution of the material structure .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%