2020
DOI: 10.3390/app10186280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FAU-Net: Fixup Initialization Channel Attention Neural Network for Complex Blood Vessel Segmentation

Abstract: Medical image segmentation based on deep learning is a central research issue in the field of computer vision. Many existing segmentation networks can achieve accurate segmentation using fewer data sets. However, they have disadvantages such as poor network flexibility and do not adequately consider the interdependence between feature channels. In response to these problems, this paper proposes a new de-normalized channel attention network, which uses an improved de-normalized residual block structure and a ne… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The weight initialization problem had been discussed before the inception of BatchNorm [5]. In 2019, a paper based on research done at Facebook developed a method called Fixup Initialization [28]. This method is another attempt to solve the exploding and vanishing gradient issue, which is related to the fact that the deeper the neural net, the larger the variance of its output will tend to be.…”
Section: Residual Learning Without Normalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weight initialization problem had been discussed before the inception of BatchNorm [5]. In 2019, a paper based on research done at Facebook developed a method called Fixup Initialization [28]. This method is another attempt to solve the exploding and vanishing gradient issue, which is related to the fact that the deeper the neural net, the larger the variance of its output will tend to be.…”
Section: Residual Learning Without Normalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is popular because it is easily interpretable and allows comparisons with other studies [ 14 ]. Less often, other performance measures such as the average Hausdorff distance [ 15 ], the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [ 16 ], sensitivity [ 17 , 18 ], specificity [ 18 ], or accuracy [ 16 18 ] are used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%