2014
DOI: 10.1109/tsg.2014.2330624
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fault Detection, Identification, and Location in Smart Grid Based on Data-Driven Computational Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fault impedances are considered as purely resistance and they are arranged in low and high groups, 0.5 and 10 Ω , respectively. Moreover, it is assumed that the fault type has been already detected based on the proposed approach in [8].…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The fault impedances are considered as purely resistance and they are arranged in low and high groups, 0.5 and 10 Ω , respectively. Moreover, it is assumed that the fault type has been already detected based on the proposed approach in [8].…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the DT reduced the computational complexity. In [8], matching pursuit decomposition was utilized for feature extraction from voltage signals. Then a hybrid-clustering algorithm was used to cluster some specific vectors for fault location purposes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Problem Specific Methodology Used [3] 2015 Sea wave Ordinal classification SVM, ANN, LR [4] 2015 Solar Classification SVM [5] 2009 Power disturbance Classification SVM, wavelets [10] 2015 Wind Optimization Bio-inspired, meta-heuristics [14] 2015 Wind Classification Fuzzy SVM [15] 2011 Wind Classification DT, SOM [16] 2015 Wind Classification SVM, k-NN, fuzzy, ANN [17] 2010 Solar Classification Semi-supervised SVM [20] 2013 Wind Ordinal classification SVM, DT, LR, HMM [30] 2014 Wind Classification SVM, LR, RF, rotation forest [31] 2011 Wind Classification ANN, LR, DT, RF [32] 2013 Wind Classification k-NN, RBF, DT [33] 2011 Wind Classification, regression BN [34] 2014 Wind Classification, regression Heuristic methodology: WPPT [35] 2011 Wind Classification Bagging, ripper, rotation forest, RF, k-NN [36] 2013 Wind Classification ANFIS, ANN [37] 2012 Wind Classification SVM [38] 2015 Wind Classification ANN, SVM [39] 2015 Wind Classification PNN [40] 2015 Wind Classification DT, BN, RF [41] 2015 Wind Classification, clustering AuDyC [42] 2016 Wind Classification, clustering AuDyC [43] 2010 Power disturbance Classification HMM, SVM, ANN [44] 2015 Power disturbance Classification SVM, NN, fuzzy, neuro-fuzzy, wavelets, GA [45] 2015 Power disturbance Classification SVM, k-NN, ANN, fuzzy, wavelets [46] 2002 Power disturbance Classification Rule-based classifiers, wavelets, HMM [47] 2004 Power disturbance Classification PNN [48] 2006 Power disturbance Classification ANN, RBF, SVM [49] 2007 Power disturbance Classification ANN, wavelets [50] 2012 Power disturbance Classification PNN [51] 2014 Power disturbance Classification ANN Table 3. Summary of the main references analyzed, grouped by application field, problem type and methodologies considered (II)...…”
Section: Reference Year Application Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the field of smart grids, [43] explores the use of Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) and matching pursuit decomposition for the detection, identification and location of power system faults. The proposed system uses voltage and frequency signals measured by a frequency disturbance recorder.…”
Section: Classification Problems and Algorithms In Fault Diagnosis Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [19], a whole function and architecture of an early warning system, and its specific design scheme are put forward, which effectively improved the scientific approach and predictability of operation decision-making for power systems. In [20], a data-driven computational method has been proposed to address fault detection, identification, and location in smart grids. Firstly, two detection hidden Markov models (HMMs) are trained for fault detection to distinguish between normal and abnormal smart grid (SG) operation conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%