IEEE Computer Society Annual Symposium on VLSI
DOI: 10.1109/isvlsi.2004.1339507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fault tolerant algorithms for network-on-chip interconnect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
69
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Works as in [17,18,29] leverage additional virtual channels to work around a few link failures. There has also been prior art that tackles the problem by flooding packets to random neighbors, hoping that they will eventually reach their destination [6,24]. Such approaches result in very low throughput during normal operation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Works as in [17,18,29] leverage additional virtual channels to work around a few link failures. There has also been prior art that tackles the problem by flooding packets to random neighbors, hoping that they will eventually reach their destination [6,24]. Such approaches result in very low throughput during normal operation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of resilient routing algorithms that can be applied to any irregular topology (i.e., a topology that survived after a number of random faults in network links) has been proposed in this domain, including up*/down* (introduced in Autonet) [27], segmentbased routing [23], FX routing [26], L-turn [21], and smartrouting [10]. During reconfiguration, the surviving topology is communicated to a central node, which runs the reconreliability performance area bounded faults early work [12,16], VCs [17,18,29] flooding [6,24] limited n/a n/a pattern constraints convex [9,31], L or T [9], polygons [20] limited n/a n/a unbounded faults off-chip routing [10,21,23 figuration algorithm in software. Using global knowledge of the functional links, the software computes new routing tables and communicates them back to each node.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such stochastic-communication algorithm separates computation from communication and provides fault tolerance to on-chip failures [57,66]. However, to eliminate the high communication overhead of flood-based fault tolerance algorithm, Pirretti et al promoted a redundant random-walk algorithm which can significantly reduce the overhead while maintaining a useful level of fault tolerance [67]. However, the basic idea of sending redundant information via multipath to achieve fault tolerance may cause much higher traffic load in the network, and the probabilistic broadcast characteristic may also result in additional unpredictable behavior on network loading.…”
Section: Reliability Design In Nocmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nodes communicate using a probabilistic broadcast: data packet is forwarded to a randomly chosen neighboring node until the entire network becomes aware of it. Directed flooding, probabilistic flooding and random walk are derived stochastic routing algorithms [14], [15]. The principal limitation of these algorithms is that they can only sustain a very low traffic injection rate.…”
Section: Related Work and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%