2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10773-014-2251-1
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fault-Tolerant Quantum Secure Direct Communication Protocol Based On Decoherence-Free States

Abstract: In this paper, we propose a quantum secure direct communication scheme based on six-qubit decoherence-free (DF) states, which can protect communication against collective decoherence noise. With the combination of DF states and error-correcting code (ECC), it achieves a fault tolerant quantum secure direct communication to prevent collective decoherence noise, limited photon loss and other noise.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the sender should confirm whether the channel is secure before he encodes his message on the quantum states because the message cannot be discarded, unlike that in QKD protocols. Many QSDC protocols have been proposed, including the protocols without using entanglement 17 18 19 , the protocols using entanglement 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 and the two-way QSDC protocols 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 . The QSDC protocol can also be used in some special environments as first proposed by Boström et al .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the sender should confirm whether the channel is secure before he encodes his message on the quantum states because the message cannot be discarded, unlike that in QKD protocols. Many QSDC protocols have been proposed, including the protocols without using entanglement 17 18 19 , the protocols using entanglement 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 and the two-way QSDC protocols 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 . The QSDC protocol can also be used in some special environments as first proposed by Boström et al .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four-qubit decoherence-free state: To prevent quantum information in qubits from being affected by collective decoherence [26][27][28], logical qubits using decoherence-free subspaces [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42] have been utilized.…”
Section: Optical Procedures Via Xknls For Single Logical Qubit Informamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, utilizing a decoherence-free subspace prevents collective decoherence [26][27][28] (identical decoherence occurring in each qubit in a system) to be spread from one subspace to another subspace in a system when uncontrolled interactions between a system and environment affect the schemes of quantum information processing. Applications (passive processes) [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42] employing a decoherence-free subspace can provide immunity against collective decoherence [26][27][28]. For the passive process, a simple method is to encode quantum information onto two-qubit systems (as a singlet state [30]) or three-qubit systems (as an entangled W state [10,12,43,44], and a three-qubit decoherence-free state [32][33][34][35]45]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A protocol is proposed which takes advantage of the physical security guarantee offered from the AlphaEta setup and builds on this using classical constructions. In Section 2 , we review the AlphaEta protocol and some definitions and results about all-or-nothing transforms (AONTs), a tool that has already proved to be useful in Li et al’s work [ 19 ]. To be able to work conveniently with individual bits when discussing security, we introduce the notion of a restricted AONT and present a way of constructing these type of transformations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%