2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.sysarc.2019.101688
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fault-tolerant real-time tasks scheduling with dynamic fault handling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All jobs in this research are independent, which means there is no dependency among the jobs. Besides, we assume all jobs require restarting of the entire job as the traditional job rescheduling approach did [30]. This is because the major concern of this paper is not the way how the job is resumed.…”
Section: General Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All jobs in this research are independent, which means there is no dependency among the jobs. Besides, we assume all jobs require restarting of the entire job as the traditional job rescheduling approach did [30]. This is because the major concern of this paper is not the way how the job is resumed.…”
Section: General Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typical software approaches for realtime and autonomous systems are based on task replication [4], [6], [22] and check-pointing/re-execution [2], [19]. Their timing impact is taken into account in order to provide timing guarantees through schedulability analysis [10], [33], [47]. Other approaches targeting the automotive domain use diverse redundancy in the form of dual-lockstep execution potentially combined with check-pointing [18] or exploiting the intrinsic redundancy available in hardware platforms [3], [45].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three mainstream redundancy techniques are widely adopted in the literature to tolerate faults: re-execution [11], checkpointing [12], and replication [13]. The re-execution approach saves task status at the beginning and detects faults at the end.…”
Section: A Fault Detection and Tolerancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In FTMC, the system would transit from a low-criticality mode to a high-criticality mode if any overrun happens or the number of transient faults incurred in the system exceeds a predefined threshold. Chen et al [12] propose an online fault-tolerant MCS scheduling framework called the FTS-RHS. The framework applies the checkpointing recovery schemes which outperforms re-execution in scheduling.…”
Section: Lo Himentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation