1975
DOI: 10.2172/4169124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fault trees for decision making in systems analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Boolean algebra and quantification computer codes like SETS (Worrel, 1985), SlPRA (SNL, 1993), FTAP (Willie, 1978), and IMPORTANCE (Lambert, 1975) were used to identify the cut sets and quantify the frequency of occurrence of IEs or the unavailability of mitigating systems or actions in such fault trees. Graphical representation of the fault trees was done with the help of SEATree (SEA, 1994)…”
Section: I 2 Plant-system Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boolean algebra and quantification computer codes like SETS (Worrel, 1985), SlPRA (SNL, 1993), FTAP (Willie, 1978), and IMPORTANCE (Lambert, 1975) were used to identify the cut sets and quantify the frequency of occurrence of IEs or the unavailability of mitigating systems or actions in such fault trees. Graphical representation of the fault trees was done with the help of SEATree (SEA, 1994)…”
Section: I 2 Plant-system Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This index characterizes the rate at which the system reliability changes with respect to changes in the reliability of a given component; it is also defined as MRI (Marginal Reliability Importance). In order to evaluate the importance of different aspects for a system, a set of different importance measures was introduced, such as Structure Importance, Reliability Criticality Importance [2], Monte-Carlo Variance Importance [3]. Other measures of components and minimal cut sets importance in coherent systems were developed by Barlow and Prochan [4,5], Fussell and Vesely [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Criticality Reliability Importance also know as Critical Importance Factor (CIF) was introduced by [20] and it is defined as: Definition 2. The criticality reliability importance of component i for system functioning , denoted by I CIF i , is defined as the probability that ith component functions and is critical for the system functioning given that the system is functioning.…”
Section: B Criticality Reliability Importance Measurementioning
confidence: 99%