2006
DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000214410.60722.b1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Favorable Midterm Results of Total Hip Arthroplasties with a Lateral Flare Uncemented Stem

Abstract: Therapeutic study, Level IV (case series).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is difficult to compare the incidence of thigh pain in various studies since the recording has not been standardized.Since no cases of aseptic loosening were recorded at the 7- and 10-year follow-up, it appears that an individual design contributes to safe fixation of the stem. Similar findings have been reported from other groups using custom stems (Wettstein et al 2005, Leali et al 2006, Akbar et al 2009). During the past 10–15 years, however, the rate of aseptic loosening has also been substantially reduced in standard uncemented stems.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, it is difficult to compare the incidence of thigh pain in various studies since the recording has not been standardized.Since no cases of aseptic loosening were recorded at the 7- and 10-year follow-up, it appears that an individual design contributes to safe fixation of the stem. Similar findings have been reported from other groups using custom stems (Wettstein et al 2005, Leali et al 2006, Akbar et al 2009). During the past 10–15 years, however, the rate of aseptic loosening has also been substantially reduced in standard uncemented stems.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The so-called lateral-flare stem was first custom manufactured beginning in 1992, and its clinical results in the young population are reported elsewhere [16] . The lateral flare stem was made available as a standardized off-theshelf prosthesis in 1997.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stem designs focused on a lateral enlargement of the proximal portion have been described for human use, and these were created to maximize the proximal adjustment and the filling of the medullary canal, providing greater torsional and axial stability 14 - 17 . This design potentially increases the contact of the implant in the metaphyseal region, thus increasing the cross-sectional diameter of the stem, allowing the stem to have a broader base of metaphysical support 25 , 26 . As a result, there is a better distribution of endosteal compressive forces, which can potentially reduce complications such as subsidence and aseptic loosening 25 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This design potentially increases the contact of the implant in the metaphyseal region, thus increasing the cross-sectional diameter of the stem, allowing the stem to have a broader base of metaphysical support 25 , 26 . As a result, there is a better distribution of endosteal compressive forces, which can potentially reduce complications such as subsidence and aseptic loosening 25 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%