2018
DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2018.2815583
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FDR-Corrected Sparse Canonical Correlation Analysis With Applications to Imaging Genomics

Abstract: Reducing the number of false discoveries is presently one of the most pressing issues in the life sciences. It is of especially great importance for many applications in neuroimaging and genomics, where data sets are typically high-dimensional, which means that the number of explanatory variables exceeds the sample size. The false discovery rate (FDR) is a criterion that can be employed to address that issue. Thus it has gained great popularity as a tool for testing multiple hypotheses. Canonical correlation a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software, version 20 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY). In the rs-fMRI data network analysis, patients were divided into three groups and bilateral cerebral hemispheres were differentiated; repeated measure analysis of variance (rmANOVA) was used with Bonferroni or FDR correction [ 24 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software, version 20 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY). In the rs-fMRI data network analysis, patients were divided into three groups and bilateral cerebral hemispheres were differentiated; repeated measure analysis of variance (rmANOVA) was used with Bonferroni or FDR correction [ 24 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An empirical study was performed on an ADNI sample to identify multi-SNP-multi-QT associations between ROI-based imaging QTs and 58 SNPs from AD-related genes. Gossmann et al [175] proposed a FDR-corrected SCCA (FDR-SCCA) procedure to introduce an FDR concept to SCCA and develop a method to control FDR. The existing SCCA methods determine the sparsity parameter using model fit criteria, such as cross validation and permutation.…”
Section: B Enhanced Scca Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DEGs and DMGs were selected by means of Student's t-test as described above. The false discovery rate (FDR) correction of P value was performed by Benjamini-Hochberg method to reduce the high false positive rate caused by multiple comparisons and the screening criteria were FDR <0.05 (13). DMEGs refer to differential expression in tissues as well as differentially methylated genes.…”
Section: Identification Of Mdegsmentioning
confidence: 99%