“…To address these issues, a diversity of impressive modification strategies have been proposed and systematically investigated, including (i) designing ingenious nano‐micro structure (e.g., sandwich‐like Ni 2 P nanoarray, 20 3D hierarchical rose‐like Ni 2 P@rGO, 23 and ultrathin few‐layer GeP nanosheets 24 ), which possesses plenty of space for volume expansion and increases the contact area between electrolyte and electrode materials to promote the diffusion of Na + and improve the stability of electrodes during the sodiation/desodiation processes; (ii) mixing with conductive carbonaceous materials (e.g., CuP 2 /C composites, 25 Sn 4 P 3 /reduced graphene oxide nanohybrids, 17 and carbon‐coated CoP 3 nanocomposites 26 ) to buffer volume variations and increase electrical conductivity of the electrodes; (iii) doping elements to improve the electrical conductivity of the electrodes (e.g., sulfur‐doped CoP 27 ). At present, combining multiple strategies to synergistically improve the performance of SIBs, such as nanochain‐like structure composed of hollow yolk‐shell Sn 4 P 3 @C nanospheres, 28 P doped onion‐like carbon layers coated FeP, 29 core‐shell Ni 2 P@carbon, 30 flower‐like Fe‐doped CoP, 31 cross‐linking hollow carbon sheet encapsulated CuP 2 nanocomposites, 32 and so on, has become the mainstream. Except for structural engineering on electrode materials, constructing self‐supporting electrodes without binder and conductive agents is another attractive approach to decrease the resistance and “dead area,” and thus can improve the electrochemical performance of SIBs.…”