2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0039-6028(00)00882-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fe epitaxial layers on Cu3Au(001): a structural study by primary-beam diffraction modulated electron emission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7,[17][18][19] Although a more sophisticated dynamic LEED technique is available, 20 the kinematic LEED analysis has been widely accepted to effectively monitor the average vertical lattice structure of the deposited films. In the relevant case of Fe/Cu 3 Au(001), kinematic LEED is shown to be a reliable technique providing results consistent with most works [21][22][23][24] of different groups using various techniques. For the magnetic properties, the magneto-optical Kerr effect (MOKE), assisted by the lock-in technique, of both longitudinal and polar geometries, was used to measure the hysteresis loops of the magnetic thin films.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…7,[17][18][19] Although a more sophisticated dynamic LEED technique is available, 20 the kinematic LEED analysis has been widely accepted to effectively monitor the average vertical lattice structure of the deposited films. In the relevant case of Fe/Cu 3 Au(001), kinematic LEED is shown to be a reliable technique providing results consistent with most works [21][22][23][24] of different groups using various techniques. For the magnetic properties, the magneto-optical Kerr effect (MOKE), assisted by the lock-in technique, of both longitudinal and polar geometries, was used to measure the hysteresis loops of the magnetic thin films.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The Au lines reduce their intensities up to reach approximately 10% of the clean surface value at 5.5 Å thickness, and thereafter remain constant for increasing coverage. Comparing our findings with previous investigations, 3,21 we can conclude that the relative amount of Cu interdiffused or segregated in the film is below 1%, whereas approximately 0.2± 0.1 monolayers of Au are segregated at the surface.…”
Section: A Structuresupporting
confidence: 83%
“…As has already been reported for surface alloys [7], chemical disorder may have a direct influence on the preferred orientation of the magnetization. Indeed, in Fe=Cu 3 Auð0 0 1Þ it has been found evidence of the presence of limited amounts of Au (less than 0:1 ML) at the topmost layer, and lower concentrations at the underlying layers [6]. This trend has also been reported for Fe=Auð0 0 1Þ [2].…”
mentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The Fe=Cu 3 Auð0 0 1Þ system features a complex evolution of the magnetic and structural properties as a function of the thickness of the Fe slab [4,5]. The ferromagnetic Fe phase is obtained for coverages over 1 ML: Initially, the magnetization aligns perpendicular to the surface and a magnetic reorientation transition (MRO) to the in-plane direction occurs at coverages between 2.5 and 3:5 MLs: A structural transformation from a pseudomorphic FCC towards a BCT phase exists at coverages of 4-5 MLs [4][5][6]. The magnetic phase transition of Fe=Cuð0 0 1Þ has been correlated to the structural transformation from a FCT to a FCC lattice [1].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%