2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.136459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fe-oxide/Al2O3 for the enhanced activity of H2S decomposition under realistic conditions: Mechanistic studies by in-situ DRIFTS and XPS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Figure f, the Fe 2p 3/2 spectrum is shown with a peak deconvolution based on the Gupta and Sen (GS) method, which considers various possible factors related to the peak broadening of Fe 2p (e.g., electrostatic interactions, L-S coupling between unpaired 3d electrons in a photoionized Fe cation and its 2p hole, and crystal field interactions). , Using the GS method, six independent componentsprepeak, surface peak, and multiple peaks 1 to 4 ranging from 708.5 to 713.8 eVwere required to fit an Fe 2p 3/2 spectrum of a single phase of Fe-oxide, and each phase of Fe-oxide had unique ratios among peaks 1–4 . In our Fe-oxide/Al 2 O 3 , ratios among peaks 1–4 were 22, 35.89, 19.14, and 22.97%, respectively, which did not perfectly match any of single phase of Fe-oxide, implying that our Fe-oxide nanoparticles were instead a mixture of various Fe-oxide phases (e.g., FeO, Fe 2 O 3 , Fe 3 O 4 , FeOOH, ...). ,, Raman spectroscopy analysis of the Fe-oxide/Al 2 O 3 could also indicate the coexistence of various phases of Fe-oxide (Figure S4). Although the additional small component at 707 eV can be attributed to either Fe carbide or metallic Fe, its relative composition was less than 10%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In Figure f, the Fe 2p 3/2 spectrum is shown with a peak deconvolution based on the Gupta and Sen (GS) method, which considers various possible factors related to the peak broadening of Fe 2p (e.g., electrostatic interactions, L-S coupling between unpaired 3d electrons in a photoionized Fe cation and its 2p hole, and crystal field interactions). , Using the GS method, six independent componentsprepeak, surface peak, and multiple peaks 1 to 4 ranging from 708.5 to 713.8 eVwere required to fit an Fe 2p 3/2 spectrum of a single phase of Fe-oxide, and each phase of Fe-oxide had unique ratios among peaks 1–4 . In our Fe-oxide/Al 2 O 3 , ratios among peaks 1–4 were 22, 35.89, 19.14, and 22.97%, respectively, which did not perfectly match any of single phase of Fe-oxide, implying that our Fe-oxide nanoparticles were instead a mixture of various Fe-oxide phases (e.g., FeO, Fe 2 O 3 , Fe 3 O 4 , FeOOH, ...). ,, Raman spectroscopy analysis of the Fe-oxide/Al 2 O 3 could also indicate the coexistence of various phases of Fe-oxide (Figure S4). Although the additional small component at 707 eV can be attributed to either Fe carbide or metallic Fe, its relative composition was less than 10%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fe-oxide nanoparticles were deposited on Al 2 O 3 using temperature-regulated chemical vapor deposition (tr-CVD). , The tr-CVD is a simple one-pot approach to incorporate small metal oxide nanoparticles into a porous substrate via diffusion of metal precursor throughout the porous network and its subsequent oxidation to metal oxide species. This method can be more environmentally friendly than liquid phase methods because it does not require any organic solvent.…”
Section: Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As shown in the high-resolution O 1s spectrum in Figure 4 d, three distinct peaks located at 529.6, 531.3 and 535.2 eV corresponded to Fe 3 O 4 , FeOOH and bacteria [ 18 , 19 ], respectively. In the high-resolution S 2p spectrum, three distinct peaks centered at 161.2, 162.4 and 164.9 eV corresponded to FeS 2 , Fe 1−x S and S, respectively ( Figure 4 e) [ 20 ]. In the high-resolution N 1s spectrum, peaks at 397.2, 398.4, 399.5 and 400.5 eV corresponded to nitride, pyridine-N, protein-N and pyrrole-N, respectively ( Figure 4 f) [ 18 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%