“…Increased surface area and roughness for improved biofilm coverage and attachment 5,7 Increased electron conductivity and decreased charge-transfer resistance for improved electron transfer to biofilm-forming microorganisms 5 -7,11 Electrocatalyst Electrocatalytic production by the metal catalyst of electron donors (e.g., H2) that can be oxidized by microorganisms in the biofilm or in the planktonic phase 8,9 Trace element Increased availability of a certain trace element (i.e., added metal) that can improve microbial growth (in case the concentration was limiting) 12,13 or alter the enzymatic pathways 14 and/or microbial community composition 15,16 Toxic compound Inhibition of microbial growth or altered microbial community composition via inhibition of metal-sensitive taxa due to high metal concentration 17,18 While both the indirect (e.g., surface properties) and direct effects (e.g., H2 production) of nickel nanostructures on MES are well known and described separately, the combination of these effects on MES has been overlooked during previous studies. For example, during studies on the effect of metals on the surface and electron transfer properties of the electrode, [5][6][7] the authors did not report abiotic testing of the synthesized cathodes, which would have revealed whether H2 production was enhanced due to metal addition, thus leading to improved acetate production by the microorganisms. Similarly, during studies on the catalytic activity of metals and its effect on MES, 8 the authors correlated the improved acetate production solely to the H2 production, without reporting the effect of the metal on the surface properties of the electrode.…”