Fear effects on bank voles (Rodentia: Arvicolinae): testing for repellent candidates from predator volatiles

Abstract

BACKGROUND Arvicolinae rodents are known pests causing damage to both agricultural and forest crops. Today, rodenticides for rodent control are widely discouraged owing to their negative effects on the environment. Rodents are the main prey for several predators, and their complex olfactory system allows them to identify risks of predation. Therefore, the potential use of predators' scents as repellents has gained interest as an ecologically based rodent control method. In a two‐choice experiment, we investigated the potential repellent effects of five synthetic predator compounds: 2‐phenylethylamine (2‐PEA), 2‐propylthietane (2‐PT), indole, heptanal and 2,5‐dihydro‐2,4,5‐trimethylthiazoline (TMT), at 1% and 5% doses, using the bank vole (Myodes glareolus) as a rodent model. RESULTS The compound 2‐PEA reduced both the food contacts and the time spent by voles in the treatment arm compared to the control arm. Likewise, 2‐PT‐treated arms reduced the food contacts, and the voles spent less time there, although this latter difference was not significant. Indole also showed a tendency to reduce the time spent at the treatment arm; however, this result was not significant. Unexpectedly, TMT had the reverse effect in showing attractive properties, possibly due to odor cues from differently sized predators and intraguild predation in nature. We found no dose‐related effects for any compounds tested. CONCLUSION Our results suggest that the 2‐PEA and 2‐PT are both effective odor stimuli for triggering reduced food contacts and area avoidance, and they may be good repellent candidates. We suggest further testing of 2‐PEA and 2‐PT in field experiments to further determine their dose‐efficiency as repellents against rodents in more natural environments. © 2022 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

Predator‐ and killed prey‐induced fears bear significant cost to an invasive spider mite: Implications in pest management

“…Further investigations into their combined effects on prey are thus warranted. In addition, recent reports show that chemical cues from predators can be used for insect 51 and rodent 52 pest management. These studies have laid new foundations for future research on novel pest control materials and methods for spider mite and other plant pests.…”

“…However, nonconsumptive effects of predators on prey fitness and forage may also contribute to pest biological control but have been rarely evaluated. 49 , 50 Two recent reports shed some light on this matter using insect 51 and mammal 52 predator–prey systems, respectively. The former indicated that predator cues can significantly reduce pest fitness and suppress pest population, and the latter shows that these cues can repel the pest.…”

Prospects for deploying microbes against tree-killing beetles (Coleoptera) in Anthropocene

“…An alternative strategy is integrating entomopathogens with semiochemicals and other natural enemies of insect pests that successfully manage insects (Sharma et al, 2019). A similar concept was recently used to protect agricultural and forest crops from the Arvicolinae rodents in Sweden (Villalobos et al, 2022). Although the application of entomopathogens or their products serves as a promising alternative to chemical pesticides, more research is still needed in this field to delve into their services thoroughly.…”

Rodents in Crop Production Agricultural Systems—Special Issue

“…New works on innovative rodenticide formulations associated with gels (that are often called rodenticide "soft baits"), liquids, polymers, and encapsulated active compounds point the way towards further development to effectively manage rodent populations and mitigate the negative effects of rodenticides [25][26][27]. Gels and liquids can be used not only for direct rodent control but also as a suitable matrix for the formulation of repellents [28] and antifeedants or as attractants for rodent monitoring using nontoxic baits. Non-toxic soft baits are increasingly used to monitor rodent abundance in commensal settings [29] and may be an effective attractant in agricultural fields as well.…”