2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12984-021-00851-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a combined virtual reality, robotics and electrical stimulation intervention in upper extremity stroke rehabilitation

Abstract: Background Approximately 80% of individuals with chronic stroke present with long lasting upper extremity (UE) impairments. We designed the perSonalized UPper Extremity Rehabilitation (SUPER) intervention, which combines robotics, virtual reality activities, and neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES). The objectives of our study were to determine the feasibility and the preliminary efficacy of the SUPER intervention in individuals with moderate/severe stroke. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
12
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…TMS was delivered by a figure-ofeight coil (Magstim coated Alpha Flat 50 mm diameter) attached to a Magstim Rapid 2 stimulator (Magstim, Carmarthenshire, UK). In line with prior studies (Camsari et al, 2019;Merchant et al, 2020;Norouzi-Gheidari et al, 2021), the coil was placed tangentially to the scalp in the present study to maximize the impact of TMS on the cortex. For the DLPFC group (Figure 2b), TMS stimulation was targeted to the left DLPFC at F3 using the 10-20 system (Curtin et al, 2019); for the LpSTS group, TMS stimulations were targeted to the left LpSTS at CP5 using the 10-20 system (Peretz & Lavidor, 2013); for the sham group, the Vertex (Cz of the 10-20 international system, e.g., Okabe, Ugawa, & Kanazawa, 2003) was chosen as the sham stimulation site based on previous studies (Pelisson, Habchi, Panouilleres, Hernoux, & Farne, 2018;Thakral, Madore, Kalinowski, & Schacter, 2020;Veniero et al, 2021), and the coil was tilted away from the scalp in a 90 angle, so there was no cortical stimulation but still touching the head (Jansen et al, 2019;Kaller et al, 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…TMS was delivered by a figure-ofeight coil (Magstim coated Alpha Flat 50 mm diameter) attached to a Magstim Rapid 2 stimulator (Magstim, Carmarthenshire, UK). In line with prior studies (Camsari et al, 2019;Merchant et al, 2020;Norouzi-Gheidari et al, 2021), the coil was placed tangentially to the scalp in the present study to maximize the impact of TMS on the cortex. For the DLPFC group (Figure 2b), TMS stimulation was targeted to the left DLPFC at F3 using the 10-20 system (Curtin et al, 2019); for the LpSTS group, TMS stimulations were targeted to the left LpSTS at CP5 using the 10-20 system (Peretz & Lavidor, 2013); for the sham group, the Vertex (Cz of the 10-20 international system, e.g., Okabe, Ugawa, & Kanazawa, 2003) was chosen as the sham stimulation site based on previous studies (Pelisson, Habchi, Panouilleres, Hernoux, & Farne, 2018;Thakral, Madore, Kalinowski, & Schacter, 2020;Veniero et al, 2021), and the coil was tilted away from the scalp in a 90 angle, so there was no cortical stimulation but still touching the head (Jansen et al, 2019;Kaller et al, 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…To prepare for the future where individuals with stroke will expect the incorporation of technologies into clinical and home‐based rehabilitation, evaluating their perceptions regarding technologies is crucial in informing research and clinical practice. Exergames can supplement motor training with fun, engaging, supervised movement practice, as well as increase the intensity and quality of movement practice, thereby enhancing rehabilitation efficacy 23–25 and functional recovery 26–35 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incorporating exergames such as Nintendo Wii Fit, Jintronix, Motion Rehab AVE 3D, Tetrax biofeedback, BIORescue, Kinect, and other noncommercial games have been shown to improve functional recovery 23–25,30,31,33,36–39 . However, the extent to which individuals with neurological disability such as stroke perceive technology and exergames favorably in the context of their rehabilitation experience remains unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another group investigated the elbow and shoulder movements of older patients with chronic stroke, using the Predict Recovery Potential algorithm. The training improved motivation, but the benefits of physical function in aging were unknown [ 2 , 37 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%