2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2018.03.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feasibility of Classification of Triple Negative Breast Cancer by Immunohistochemical Surrogate Markers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
45
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
5
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One recent study established a surrogate IHC panel for the molecular classification of TNBC and examined the relationship between the IHC-based subtypes and patients' clinicopathological features [39]. However, in that study, the researchers did not perform gene expression profiling on the samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One recent study established a surrogate IHC panel for the molecular classification of TNBC and examined the relationship between the IHC-based subtypes and patients' clinicopathological features [39]. However, in that study, the researchers did not perform gene expression profiling on the samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are currently no routine diagnostic tools for identifying CL breast cancer in the clinic and gene expression profiling remains the gold standard for molecular subtyping of TNBC. 77 As such, CL breast cancer is often more broadly categorised as TNBC in the clinic and targeted therapies are non-existent for patients with CL breast cancer. 78 Efforts are already underway to better diagnose CL breast cancer in the clinic and it will be interesting to see the potential of fatty acid metabolism genes to serve as markers of CL breast cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lehmann et al analyzed 587 TNBC cases and identified 6 TNBC subtypes displaying unique gene expression profile: two basal-like (BL1 and BL2), an immunomodulatory (IM), a mesenchymal (M), a mesenchymal stem-like (MSL) and a Luminal Androgen Receptor subtype (LAR), composed of AR driven tumors, and that has been suggested to be correlated to the previously identified by Farmer et al “Molecular Apocrine” subtype (MA) (Farmer et al, 2005; Lehmann et al, 2011; Lehmann-Che et al, 2013). Among these subtypes, LAR type was found to be associated with older patient age, apocrine histologic features, low density of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL), and low Ki-67 labeling index (Kim et al, 2018). Sex steroid hormone receptors, ER and PGR, have always played a leading role in the development and progression of BC; however, in the last years, AR has emerged as a prominent player to focus attention on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%