To my knowledge, the GOG has not officially performed a phase I/II study of CCRT with weekly cisplatin at a dose of 40 mg/m 2 . Therefore, there are no feasibility data for this protocol evaluated by standard DLT criteria, as Watanabe et al. 6 stated in their report. Keys et al.,3 in GOG-123, showed that 90% of patients were able to receive four or more courses of cisplatin. Similarly, Rose et al. 2 reported that, in GOG-120, four or more courses could be delivered in over 90% of patients and that nearly half of all patients received all the planned courses (six courses) of cisplatin. However, these studies 2,3 did not describe the details or the number of patients who required treatment modification and/or treatment delay, especially in regard to cisplatin administration. As mentioned above, Watanabe et al. 6 have now stated explicitly that more than a 7-day treatment delay constitutes a DLT. Can we not conclude that 8-14 days of delay in cisplatin administration is clinically acceptable in CCRT? Watanabe et al. 6 reported that all patients with DLT experienced granulocytopenia on the day of the planned fourth cycle of cisplatin. If further waiting had been allowed for these patients, the fourth cycle might have been safely given, and this phase I study could have reached a different conclusion. Ohno et al. 7 reported another Japanese phase I study, from the National Institute of Radiological Sciences in Japan. They concluded that weekly cisplatin at 40 mg/m 2 was feasible for Japanese patients. In the Ohno study, a longer treatment delay was allowed; namely, 2 weeks for radiotherapy and 3 weeks for chemotherapy. It should be noted that these authors reported that four of five patients who developed DLT were able to receive the full course of radiotherapy without interruption. In their report, Watanabe et al. 6 also showed that most patients were able to receive the full dose of radiation despite developing DLT.Regrettably, in their current article, Watanabe et al. did not provide a detailed toxicity profile. Table 1 shows the toxicities that have been reported for CCRT using weekly cisplatin at 40 mg/m 2 . The article by Ikushima et al. 8 reports retrospective toxicity data for Japanese patients with cervical cancer who were given concurrent weekly cisplatin and radiotherapy. These authors decided to determine cisplatin Several randomized trials have demonstrated the therapeutic advantage of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) over radiation alone in the treatment of locoregionally advanced uterine cervical cancer. 1-4 Consequently, CCRT is now considered a standard treatment component for patients with uterine cervical cancer. In these trials, cisplatin was used alone or in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Rose et al. 2 demonstrated similar survival results and less toxicity with weekly cisplatin compared with moderatedose cisplatin and 5-FU in a Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) study (GOG-120). Based on those results, weekly cisplatin (40 mg/m 2 ) is now a standard regimen in the United States. Howev...