2015
DOI: 10.1186/s12896-015-0180-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feasibility of Cowpea chlorotic mottle virus-like particles as scaffold for epitope presentations

Abstract: Background & MethodsWithin the last decade Virus-Like Particles (VLPs) have increasingly received attention from scientists for their use as a carrier of (peptide) molecules or as scaffold to present epitopes for use in subunit vaccines. To test the feasibility of Cowpea chlorotic mottle virus (CCMV) particles as a scaffold for epitope presentation and identify sites for epitope fusion or insertion that would not interfere with virus-like-particle formation, chimeric CCMV coat protein (CP) gene constructs were… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scale bars: 200 nm. While CPs of numerous viruses accommodate genetic fusions and retain their ability to self-assemble into VLPs, those are commonly restricted to peptides as exemplified with simian virus 40 (Takahashi et al, 2008), bacteriophage P22 (Servid et al, 2013) or CCMV (Brumfield et al, 2004;Hassani-Mehraban et al, 2015) rather than full-length proteins. Another common limitation observed with VLPs is linked to sites of insertion of foreign proteins not necessarily located at the extremities but often exposed within loops of the CP, as it is the case for hepatitis B virus (Kratz et al, 1999;Peyret et al, 2015) or CPMV (Porta et al, 2003), requiring the inserted proteins to be fused to both their extremities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scale bars: 200 nm. While CPs of numerous viruses accommodate genetic fusions and retain their ability to self-assemble into VLPs, those are commonly restricted to peptides as exemplified with simian virus 40 (Takahashi et al, 2008), bacteriophage P22 (Servid et al, 2013) or CCMV (Brumfield et al, 2004;Hassani-Mehraban et al, 2015) rather than full-length proteins. Another common limitation observed with VLPs is linked to sites of insertion of foreign proteins not necessarily located at the extremities but often exposed within loops of the CP, as it is the case for hepatitis B virus (Kratz et al, 1999;Peyret et al, 2015) or CPMV (Porta et al, 2003), requiring the inserted proteins to be fused to both their extremities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VLPs from plant viruses have been produced in various microbial expression systems, namely Escherichia coli , Pseudomonas fluorescens , Pichia pastoris and Saccharomyces cerevisiae [26, 3134]. These expression systems include prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms, each having its own advantages and drawbacks.…”
Section: Backgoundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the lack of post-translational modifications and the presence of endotoxins are the most intriguing problems when using these systems [35]. Moreover, since large amount of proteins is often produced in an insoluble form, extra denaturation and refolding processes may be required, as it was the case for CCMV [26]. Concerning the yeast expression system, the quantity of the produced proteins is usually lower than in E. coli .…”
Section: Backgoundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for targeting) conjugated to outer surface while its inner cavity can host different types of cargo. 36 Furthermore, unlike adenoviruses, CCMV and other plantderived viruses are non-pathogenic for humans and are regarded as safe for potential human use 37 and have a broad in vivo biodistribution without any toxicity. 38 Therefore, CCMV-based protein cages hold a great promise as biocompatible nanoscaffolds for applications in nanomedicine such as targeted drug delivery systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%