2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2013.02.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feasibility of identifying leaking fuel rods using gamma tomography

Abstract: In cases of fuel failure in irradiated nuclear fuel assemblies, causing leakage of fission gasses from a fuel rod, there is a need for reliable non-destructive measurement methods that can determine which rod is failed. Methods currently in use include visual inspection, eddy current, and ultrasonic testing, but additional alternatives have been under consideration, including tomographic gamma measurements.The simulations covered in this report show that tomographic measurements could be feasible. By measuring… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Once a failure has been detected, the specific rod or rods need to be identified. One method of identifying a leaking rod is to compare the fission product distribution in the suspected failed rods [Dobrin et al (1997); Holcombe et al (2013)]. After a rod cladding failure, fission gases that would usually be in the gas-plenum escape from the rod.…”
Section: Cladding Investigationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Once a failure has been detected, the specific rod or rods need to be identified. One method of identifying a leaking rod is to compare the fission product distribution in the suspected failed rods [Dobrin et al (1997); Holcombe et al (2013)]. After a rod cladding failure, fission gases that would usually be in the gas-plenum escape from the rod.…”
Section: Cladding Investigationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only the peripheral rods of the assembly can be seen due the low energy of the assayed g rays. The reconstruction was carried out using FBP[Holcombe et al (2013)]. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%