Sensitive, high-throughput methods to detect malaria parasites in low-transmission settings are needed. PCR-based pooling strategies may offer a solution. We first used laboratory-prepared samples to compare 2 DNA extraction and 4 PCR detection methods across a range of pool sizes and parasite densities. Pooled Chelex extraction of DNA, followed by nested PCR of cytochrome b, was the optimal strategy, allowing reliable detection of a single low-parasitemic sample (100 parasites/l) in pool sizes up to 50. This PCR-based pooling strategy was then compared with microscopy using 891 dried blood spots from a cohort of 77 Ugandan children followed for 2 years in an urban setting of low endemicity. Among 419 febrile episodes, 35 cases of malaria were detected using the PCR-based pooling strategy and 40 cases using microscopy. All five cases of malaria not detected by PCR were from samples stored for >2 years with parasitemia of <6,000/l, highlighting the issue of possible DNA degradation with long-term storage of samples. Among 472 samples collected from asymptomatic children as part of routine surveillance, 15 (3.2%) were positive by PCR-based pooling compared to 4 (0.8%) by microscopy (P ؍ 0.01). Thus, this PCR-based pooling strategy for detection of malaria parasites using dried blood spots offers a sensitive and efficient approach for malaria surveillance in low-transmission settings, enabling improved detection of asymptomatic submicroscopic infections and dramatic savings in labor and costs.Due to large-scale implementation of effective control measures, many countries where malaria is endemic are experiencing dramatic declines in disease burden. With this success has come a shift in the end goal from control to elimination (9, 10). However, when the goal is elimination, accurate detection of persons infected with malaria parasites becomes essential (11). Standard surveillance systems depend on diagnosis by microscopy, a method that is technically challenging, labor-intensive, and often inaccurate in operational settings. More recently available rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) provide convenience and ease of use, but they have limitations in specificity, sensitivity, species identification, and cost (22).PCR-based methods for malaria parasite detection are relatively simple and provide improved sensitivity compared to microscopy and RDTs, especially in settings where infections have low parasitemia or contain mixed species (22). PCR can also be performed on dried blood spots, which are convenient for collection, storage, and transport. Nonetheless, PCR has a long turnaround time, making it an impractical tool for clinical care of individual patients. One exception would be real-time PCR, which has a short turnaround time but carries with it cost and capacity constraints that make it unavailable for rapid diagnosis in most settings. However, there is a potential role for PCR in situations where large numbers of samples are being screened: a high-throughput system could allow accurate, rapid, and cost-effective ass...