2003
DOI: 10.1017/s095267570400003x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feature economy in sound systems

Abstract: Feature economy is a principle of sound systems according to which languages tend to maximise the ratio of sounds over features. The major goal of this study is to confirm the predictions of feature economy at the synchronic level, using an objective sampling technique applied to a genetically and areally balanced sample of the world's languages. It also shows that feature economy can be used as a tool in phonological feature analysis, and offers voiced aspirates, voiceless sonorants and various types of glott… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
107
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
107
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another consideration is whether it can help to explain skews in typology that cannot be explained by phonetics alone. One likely set of cases involves tendencies toward systemic simplicity, like feature economy (Clements 2003). Pater and Moreton (2012) and Pater and Staubs (2013) provide some initial results showing that skews toward systemic simplicity emerge from iterated learning using the basic grammar and learning setup adopted here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Another consideration is whether it can help to explain skews in typology that cannot be explained by phonetics alone. One likely set of cases involves tendencies toward systemic simplicity, like feature economy (Clements 2003). Pater and Moreton (2012) and Pater and Staubs (2013) provide some initial results showing that skews toward systemic simplicity emerge from iterated learning using the basic grammar and learning setup adopted here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…--normally (modally) voiced "implosives" do not correlate with glottalized sounds in phoneme inventories, while ejectives and laryngealized sounds do (Clements 2003). …”
Section: Implosives and Other Nonobstruent Stopsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Typical of large inventories, however, the size is derived by cross-cutting a fairly simple inventory with other features (Clements 2003), in this case the features of labialization and glottalization. For present purposes, the crucial point is that four consonant classes must be distinguished for an understanding of glottalization and lenition: (a) oral stops (including affricates), (b) fricatives, (c) nasals, and (d) glides.…”
Section: Structure Of the Inventorymentioning
confidence: 99%