2009 Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications 2009
DOI: 10.1109/dicta.2009.71
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feature Extraction from Contours Shape for Tumor Analyzing in Mammographic Images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are not the best result compared to local works (Boujelben et al, 2009a) (Boujelben et al, 2009b). However, in (Boujelben et al, 2009b) the result is about 94% in boundary information; and in (Boujelben et al, 2009a) the result is between 90% and 92% using XRDM method.…”
Section: Experimental Results: Performance In Terms Of Diagnosis Qualitymentioning
confidence: 61%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…These results are not the best result compared to local works (Boujelben et al, 2009a) (Boujelben et al, 2009b). However, in (Boujelben et al, 2009b) the result is about 94% in boundary information; and in (Boujelben et al, 2009a) the result is between 90% and 92% using XRDM method.…”
Section: Experimental Results: Performance In Terms Of Diagnosis Qualitymentioning
confidence: 61%
“…However, in (Boujelben et al, 2009b) the result is about 94% in boundary information; and in (Boujelben et al, 2009a) the result is between 90% and 92% using XRDM method. In such work, we used DDSM database but the ROI is selected from the image by fixing a rectangular box around the suspicious lesion area and the classical method of segmentation based on Sobel filter and thresholding.…”
Section: Experimental Results: Performance In Terms Of Diagnosis Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations