2018
DOI: 10.4108/eai.20-10-2021.171548
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feature Extraction using CNN for Peripheral Blood Cells Recognition

Abstract: INTRODUCTION:The diagnosis of hematological diseases is based on the morphological differentiation of the peripheral blood cell types. OBJECTIVES: In this work, a hybrid model based on CNN features extraction and machine learning classifiers were proposed to improve peripheral blood cell image classification. METHODS: At first, a CNN model composed of four convolution layers and three fully connected layers was proposed. Second, the features from the deeper layers of the CNN classifier were extracted. Third, s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, a classification layer computes weighted classification tasks, employing mutually exclusive tasks and cross-entropy loss for classification. The network is trained using stochastic gradient descent with momentum (sgdm) [42]. By incorporating a momentum term, sgdm overcomes the oscillation issues of standard stochastic gradient descent.…”
Section: Methods B-training and Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, a classification layer computes weighted classification tasks, employing mutually exclusive tasks and cross-entropy loss for classification. The network is trained using stochastic gradient descent with momentum (sgdm) [42]. By incorporating a momentum term, sgdm overcomes the oscillation issues of standard stochastic gradient descent.…”
Section: Methods B-training and Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed DLBCNet is compared to other state-of-the-art methods on the same public dataset, including CNN-AdaboostM1 [18] and the Xception-LSTM [20]. The comparison results of the proposed DLBCNet with other state-of-the-art methods are provided in Table 10.…”
Section: Comparison With State-of-the-art Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Con-SVM model could achieve 85.96% accuracy. Ammar et al [18] applied seven different combinations of CNN models with other traditional classifiers to classify blood cells, including KNN, SVM, and AdaboostM1. Finally, the CNN-AdaboostM1 yielded 88% accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acevedo et al recently recommended that two pre-trained models, VGG16 and Inception-V3, be used to categorize normal blood cell pictures, with model VGG16 claiming the highest accuracy of 96.20% (Acevedo et al, 2019). In another work (Ammar et al, 2021), a CNN-based model is designed with four convolutional layers and three fully connected layers. The Adaboost algorithm was used as a feature extractor, and classification was done using machine learning strategies such as k-nearest neighbours, support vector machine with linear kernel, and support vector machine with RBF kernel function, with the Adaboost algorithm achieving the highest accuracy of 88.8%.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%