2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2007.01.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feature extraction via KPCA for classification of gait patterns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
83
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
5
83
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The previous studies reported classification rates of 89.6% based on kinematic variables (Wu et al, 2006) and of 91.0% based on the combination of kinematic and spatio-temporal variables (Wu et al, 2007). Based on the proposed approach in the current paper, a classification rate of 95.8% (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The previous studies reported classification rates of 89.6% based on kinematic variables (Wu et al, 2006) and of 91.0% based on the combination of kinematic and spatio-temporal variables (Wu et al, 2007). Based on the proposed approach in the current paper, a classification rate of 95.8% (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Previous studies used pattern classification methods to differentiate gait patterns of young-elderly groups based on such kinematic variables (Wu et al, 2006) or the combination of kinematic and spatio-temporal variables (Wu et al, 2007) with classification rates of 89.6% and 91%, respectively. While these classification rates indicate the ability of pattern classification to differentiate the group gait patterns, a possible loss of information may have been introduced by the methods that were applied to the data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the second method has the disadvantage that the evaluation of features is dependent upon classifier type, two classifiers, the SVM with a linear kernel (Janssen et al, 2011;Wu, Wang, & Liu, 2007) and the LDA (Lee, Roan, Smith, & Lockhart, 2009), were used to determine if gender, age, and exercise conditions were classifiable based on the PC scores. A tenfold cross validation method was applied to obtain classification rates from the classifiers for gender and age, while a leave-one-out cross validation method was used for the PFP group.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, 36 of the most representative joint parameters were extracted from the joint kinematic analysis according to a previous study [14]. The extracted joint parameters for each lower body joint are shown in Tables 3, 4 and 5, respectively.…”
Section: Joint Parameters and The Calculation Of Jnimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, several previous studies have focused on comparing only a limited number of specific gait characteristics [5][6][7][8][9] or obtaining reduced variables using multivariate statistic techniques [10] to evaluate gait pathologies more objectively [11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. In particular, these indices have been shown to be clinically meaningful indicators not only for a more general representation of a subject's overall gait pathologies but also for more objective gait analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%