Features of gustatory system morphology in early juveniles of Siberian sturgeon Acipenser baerii (Acipenseridae, Acipenseriformes)

Девицина, Г. В.; Golovkina, T. V.; Rod’kin, M. M.

doi:10.1134/s0032945211110038

Cited by 7 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The tongue, which is an important sensory organ in fish, plays also a role in the intake and ingestion of food (Abbate, Guerrera, Montalbano, Ciriaco, & Germanà, 2012; Abbate, Guerrera, Montalbano, De Carlos, et al, 2012). It has been reported that the tongue is composed of three parts in Siberian sturgeon (Devitsina et al, 2011), zebrafish (Abbate et al, 2006), white sea bream (Guerrera et al, 2015), European sea bass (Abbate, Guerrera, Montalbano, De Carlos, et al, 2012), swordfish (Abbate et al, 2017), northern pike (Sadeghinezhad et al, 2015), argus (Thongboon et al, 2017), gilthead seabream (Abbate, Guerrera, Montalbano, Ciriaco, & Germanà, 2012), mackerel (Kettratad et al, 2017), pufferfish (Timurlenk & Çınar, 2014), oscar fish (Demirbağ et al, 2013), and rainbow trout (Abbate, Guerrera, Levanti, Laurà, Aragona, et al, 2020). In the study, it was similar to the literature that the tongue was macroscopically composed of three parts: apex, body, and root.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…There are differences in the shape of the tongue in many fish species. Tongue shape is roughly triangular in white sea bream (Guerrera et al, 2015); triangular in gilthead seabream (Abbate, Guerrera, Montalbano, Ciriaco, & Germanà, 2012), swordfish (Abbate et al, 2017) and northern pike (Sadeghinezhad et al, 2015); conical in Siberian sturgeon (Devitsina et al, 2011); and a truncated pyramid in Atlantic salmon and European sea bass (Abbate, Guerrera, Levanti, Laurà, Germanà, et al, 2020; Abbate, Guerrera, Montalbano, De Carlos, et al, 2012). Aside from these general shape differences, the shape of the apex of the tongue can also vary according to species.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The tongue in bony fish consists of apex, body, and root, similar to mammals (Abbate, Guerrera, Levanti, Laurà, Aragona, et al, 2020; Abbate, Guerrera, Montalbano, De Carlos, et al, 2012; Devitsina et al, 2011; Thongboon et al, 2017; Timurlenk & Çınar, 2014). Depending on the feeding habits, the shape of the tongue is expressed differently as roughly triangular (Guerrera et al, 2015), triangular (Abbate et al, 2017; Abbate, Guerrera, Montalbano, Ciriaco, & Germanà, 2012; Sadeghinezhad et al, 2015), conical (Devitsina et al, 2011), and truncated pyramid (Abbate, Guerrera, Levanti, Laurà, Germanà, et al, 2020; Abbate, Guerrera, Montalbano, De Carlos, et al, 2012).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Morphology of the tongue dorsal surface of turbot (Scophthalmus maximus)

Onuk

Yardımcı

Sizer

et al. 2022

Microscopy Res & Technique

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aimed to analyze the morphology of the tongue, which varies among fish species and has not been studied in turbot (Scophthalmus maximus), using macro-anatomical, light and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). As research materials, the tongues of eight adult turbot, which were used for consumption, were examined. The roughly triangular-shaped tongue of the turbot consisted of three parts: apex, body, and root. The thickness of the tongue continued to increase from the apex to the root. Although papillae were not observed in the macroscopic examination of the tongue, microscopic examination revealed the presence of cone-like shaped papillae on the submucosa. The tongue was composed of mucosa, submucosa, and hyaline cartilage.By SEM the presence of the taste buds (Types I and III), taste pores and papillae on the dorsal surface were demonstrated. Taste buds are the first descriptions in S. maximus.Therefore our results could add new data to the fish tongue anatomy. HighlightsMorphological and morphometric data of the turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) tongue were obtained in this study and compared with other species. In addition, the dorsal surface of the turbot tongue was described for the first time using SEM.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Morphology of the tongue dorsal surface of turbot (Scophthalmus maximus)

Onuk

Yardımcı

Sizer

et al. 2022

Microscopy Res & Technique

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Sturgeons have a well-developed gustatory system with numerous taste buds distributed in the mouth and in the epidermis of both barbells and lips (Devitsina et al, 2011;Kasumyan, 1999Kasumyan, , 2002Nieuwenhuys, 1998). Taste information is conveyed to primary taste centers (vagal lobe) via the facial, glossopharyngeal, and vagus nerves.…”

Section: Viscerosensory Lobes and Octavolateralis Areamentioning

confidence: 99%

Distribution of gamma‐aminobutyric acid immunoreactivity in the brain of the Siberian sturgeon (Acipenser baeri): Comparison with other fishes

Anadón,

Rodríguez‐Moldes,

Adrio

2024

J of Comparative Neurology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Gamma‐aminobutyric acid (GABA) is the main inhibitory neurotransmitter in the central nervous system (CNS) of vertebrates. Immunohistochemical techniques with specific antibodies against GABA or against its synthesizing enzyme, glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) allowed characterizing GABAergic neurons and fibers in the CNS. However, studies on the CNS distribution of GABAergic neurons and fibers of bony fishes are scant and were done in teleost species. With the aim of understanding the early evolution of this system in bony vertebrates, we analyzed the distribution of GABA‐immunoreactive (‐ir) and GAD‐ir neurons and fibers in the CNS of a basal ray‐finned fish, the Siberian sturgeon (Chondrostei, Acipenseriformes), using immunohistochemical techniques. Our results revealed the presence and distribution of GABA/GAD‐ir cells in different regions of the CNS such as olfactory bulbs, pallium and subpallium, hypothalamus, thalamus, pretectum, optic tectum, tegmentum, cerebellum, central grey, octavolateralis area, vagal lobe, rhombencephalic reticular areas, and the spinal cord. Abundant GABAergic innervation was observed in most brain regions, and GABAergic fibers were very abundant in the hypothalamic floor along the hypothalamo‐hypophyseal tract and neurohypophysis. In addition, GABA‐ir cerebrospinal fluid‐contacting cells were observed in the alar and basal hypothalamus, saccus vasculosus, and spinal cord central canal. The distribution of GABAergic systems in the sturgeon brain shows numerous similarities to that observed in lampreys, but also to those of teleosts and tetrapods.

show abstract

“…Fish have well-developed chemoreception due to olfactory and gustatory analyzers [9,10,11,12,13,14]. Studies aimed to identify the preference of feeds with one or another smell and taste are numerous, but, as a rule, they are not related to the determination of the fish yielding qualities (A.O.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of free choice of feed on the productive qualities of two-year-old carp (cyprinus carpio l.) in ponds

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The results of research on the effect of feed with different feeding values and organoleptic properties on the productivity of two-year-old carp are presented. Within the same pond, the joint use of demand feeders (feeds with different tastes) makes it possible for fish to choose one of them in response to well-developed chemoreception. Diets of different calories affect the quality of the resulting fish production at different feed consumption. The combination of two feed types within one pond provides fish food savings per gain, despite the higher total consumption. Two-year-old fish give preference to more high-energy fish food. At the same time, fish consume 1/3–1/4 of low-energy food, regardless of the feeding time. The mass of fish consuming only low-energy fish food is 1.7 and 2.6 times less than that of fish consuming only high-energy fish food and fish simultaneously consuming these two foods, respectively. Combined feeding contributes to an increase in the relative muscle mass, primarily in comparison with fish fed only a high-energy diet. Fish-farming biological characteristics indicate higher fish yielding qualities in the case of simultaneous use of two types of feed (K-111 and Karp-38/12). Taste priorities must be considered in aquaculture fish farming.

show abstract

Features of gustatory system morphology in early juveniles of Siberian sturgeon Acipenser baerii (Acipenseridae, Acipenseriformes)

Cited by 7 publications

References 4 publications

Morphology of the tongue dorsal surface of turbot (Scophthalmus maximus)

Morphology of the tongue dorsal surface of turbot (Scophthalmus maximus)

Distribution of gamma‐aminobutyric acid immunoreactivity in the brain of the Siberian sturgeon (Acipenser baeri): Comparison with other fishes

Influence of free choice of feed on the productive qualities of two-year-old carp (cyprinus carpio l.) in ponds

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About