Features of the Armed Conflict in Ukraine

Abstract

Conflicts may arise within countries as well as between different countries. Conflict is an integral component of human existence. Conflicts occur in the economic, political, social, ideological, military, managerial and other spheres of public life. Accordingly, the methods and ways of their settlement vary significantly. It is dangerous that both internal (intrastate) and external (interstate) conflicts reduce the country's ability to defend its own interests in the world. Under certain circumstances, such conflicts can be used by external and internal players as an instrument of pressure on the state leadership and encourage it to adopt decisions and agreements that are unfavorable for the country. The solution to any conflicts requires a deep understanding of both the nature of their occurrence and the dynamics of the flow. Today the most dangerous for Ukraine is the armed conflict in the Donbass. This conflict was provoked by the Russian Federation, which sees our country as a “buffer zone” against international military threats. The level of conflict in the zone of armed confrontation is very high. Negotiations at the international level and the efforts to resolve the conflict in Donbass did not bring the desired success. The citizens of Ukraine have no confidence in the successful completion of this conflict. It provokes a social apathy and aggression in Ukrainian society. The cessation of the armed conflict in Donbass is extremely important both for Ukraine and the entire world community. Now Ukraine is forced to develop a strategy of national self-preservation in the difficult and uncertain conditions of international security. Finding optimal answers to hybrid threats is a necessary precondition for maintaining the sovereignty and territorial integrity of our state.

Prospects of Transformation of the Institution of Constitutional Justice in the Course of Armed Conflicts

“…The author made a detailed comparative analysis of the application of the constitutional complaint mechanism in three European countries and four members of the Association of Asian Constitutional Courts & Equivalent Institutions (AACC). Averyanova (2019) analysed the types of conflicts that can arise both within countries and between different states. The author outlined such relevant vectors as objectivity, subjectivity, implementation in practice and indicated the need to develop a strategy of national self-preservation in complex and uncertain conditions of international security.…”

“…Constitutional courts during armed conflicts act as mediators that determine proper boundaries of regulatory acts adopted in wartime in democratic states. Relevant legal initiatives in wartime should be limited in the exercise of the powers by the rule of law and respect for human rights (Averyanova, 2019).…”