2021
DOI: 10.1002/wcms.1567
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Featurization strategies for protein–ligand interactions and their applications in scoring function development

Abstract: The predictive performance of classical scoring functions (SFs) seems to have reached a plateau. Currently, SFs relying on sophisticated machine learning techniques have shown great potential in binding affinity prediction and virtual screening. As one of the most indispensable components in the workflow of training a machine learning scoring function (MLSF), the featurization or representation process enables us to catch certain physical processes that are important for protein–ligand interactions and to obta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 148 publications
(189 reference statements)
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The top-ranked poses were subjected for refinement and calculation of binding free energies (ΔG), which was evaluated by scoring function (GBVI/WSA dg) [ 45 ]. A reliable scoring scheme that results in the docking score of the correct binding poses was established by the number of molecular interactions (hydrogen, Pi, and hydrophobic interactions) [ 46 ]. The MOE database of the docked complex was visualized carefully to understand the mode of binding interactions of α-glucosidase inhibitors bound in the selected pocket of the target protein.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The top-ranked poses were subjected for refinement and calculation of binding free energies (ΔG), which was evaluated by scoring function (GBVI/WSA dg) [ 45 ]. A reliable scoring scheme that results in the docking score of the correct binding poses was established by the number of molecular interactions (hydrogen, Pi, and hydrophobic interactions) [ 46 ]. The MOE database of the docked complex was visualized carefully to understand the mode of binding interactions of α-glucosidase inhibitors bound in the selected pocket of the target protein.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also frequently applied in interpreting activity landscapes, supporting structural databases, and analyzing protein-ligand complexes to search for similarities, e.g., by calculating the Tanimoto coefficient of bit vectors. In rational drug discovery, SIFt supports processing virtual screening results [ 39 , 31 , 40 ] or developing new scoring functions [ 41 , 42 ]. With the growing importance of artificial intelligence methods in drug discovery, new applications of interaction fingerprints emerged.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more in-depth overview of featurization strategies for protein-ligand interactions that are commonly employed in the development of ML and DL SFs is given by Xiong et al (2021), while an overview of common molecular representations used in AI-driven drug discovery is provided by David et al (2020).…”
Section: Descriptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%