2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2005.05.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fecal coliform bacteria disappearance rates in a north-central Gulf of Mexico estuary

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
34
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Province-SOTE, 2002). Studies have shown that faecal coliforms, more specifically E. coli, increases after a rainfall but thereafter, decrease as a result of the process of sedimentation (Webster et al, 2004;Chigbu et al, 2005;Elmanama et al, 2005). The levels of bacterial contamination in all the five river catchments were widespread during winter and summer seasons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Province-SOTE, 2002). Studies have shown that faecal coliforms, more specifically E. coli, increases after a rainfall but thereafter, decrease as a result of the process of sedimentation (Webster et al, 2004;Chigbu et al, 2005;Elmanama et al, 2005). The levels of bacterial contamination in all the five river catchments were widespread during winter and summer seasons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Additionally, bacteria could travel some distances (nearly 2.4 km from the discharge point) as a result of pump-ing, depending on wind direction/intensity and current (Jeng et al, 2005). Chigbu et al (2005) noted that after a peak in TTC values the numbers decline rapidly in 0.3 to 13 days (an average of 6 days); their dynamics in coastal waters is a function of the bacterial load from inflowing streams and rivers, mass transport, and losses due to death and sedimentation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To justify the occurrence of a specific coliform in an organism and not in the water, Pommepuy et al (1996) proposed that enterobacteria are best preserved when the microorganisms are ingested by organisms, which may account for the great differences observed in bacterial counts. Chigbu et al (2005) noted that TTC in surface waters decrease or disappear from the water column with time through death and sedimentation processes, and can concentrate in sediments at high densities. Likewise, Troussellier (1998) stated that water microbes directly discharged into receiving waters could remain in the water column and be transported for some distance prior to their die-off, precipitate to the bottom sediment, or remain suspended in the surface water overlying the bottom sediment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The concentrations of stormwater pollutants, such as suspended solids, nutrients, and metals, are known to generally follow the trends of the hydrograph (Deletic, 1998;Lee and Bang, 2000)However, FIB in stormwater are reported to remain in persistently high concentrations after storms have subsided (Chigbu et al, 2005;Surbeck et al, 2006). While the above-referenced studies focus on real watersheds, another study (Ferguson et al, 2007) uses simulated rainfall on experimental plots of land to determine the transport rates of different indicators and pathogens over land.…”
Section: Stormwater Flow Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%