2004
DOI: 10.3133/sir20045257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fecal-indicator bacteria in the Newfound Creek watershed, western North Carolina, during a high and low streamflow condition, 2003

Abstract: Water quality in the Newfound Creek watershed has been shown to be affected by bacteria, sediment, and nutrients. In this study, Escherichia coli (E. coli) bacteria were sampled at five sites in Newfound Creek and five tributary sites during low flow on May 28, 2003, and high flow on November 19, 2003. In addition, a subset of five sites was sampled for fecal coliform bacteria, E. coli bacteria in streambed sediments (low flow only), and coliphage virus for serotyping. Coliphage virus serotyping has been used … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, this variability in conjunction with resuspension is a likely explanation for the erratic variations in indicator organism concentrations frequently reported in water quality monitoring (Chawla et al, 2003;Giddings and Oblinger, 2004). In fact, this variability in conjunction with resuspension is a likely explanation for the erratic variations in indicator organism concentrations frequently reported in water quality monitoring (Chawla et al, 2003;Giddings and Oblinger, 2004).…”
Section: Bottom Sedimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, this variability in conjunction with resuspension is a likely explanation for the erratic variations in indicator organism concentrations frequently reported in water quality monitoring (Chawla et al, 2003;Giddings and Oblinger, 2004). In fact, this variability in conjunction with resuspension is a likely explanation for the erratic variations in indicator organism concentrations frequently reported in water quality monitoring (Chawla et al, 2003;Giddings and Oblinger, 2004).…”
Section: Bottom Sedimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Escherichia coli concentrations in sediments exhibit substantial spatial variability, which has often been attributed to differences in sediment particle size distributions (Niewolak, 1998; Cinotto, 2005; Atwill et al, 2007) and organic matter contents (Ferguson et al, 1996; Buckley et al, 1998). Bacterial loads associated with human or animal presence and/or activities could, in some cases, be related to the elevated concentrations of E. coli in freshwater sediments (Giddings and Oblinger, 2004; Haller et al, 2009). Localized differences in water velocity and shear stress along a stream have also been thought to influence concentrations of fecal bacteria in sediments (Gordon et al, 2004; Piorkowski et al, 2014b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%