2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2204.02450
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Federated Cross Learning for Medical Image Segmentation

Abstract: Federated learning (FL) can collaboratively train deep learning models using isolated patient data owned by different hospitals for various clinical applications, including medical image segmentation. However, a major problem of FL is its performance degradation when dealing with the data that are not independently and identically distributed (non-iid), which is often the case in medical images. In this paper, we first conduct a theoretical analysis on the FL algorithm to reveal the problem of model aggregatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12 More and more research works in medical image segmentation involve an FL scheme [211]. Recently, Xu et al [212] introduced in a new federated cross-learning segmentation approach that handles data that are not independently and identically distributed. Unlike the conventional FL methods that combine multiple individually trained local models on a server node, the proposed method named FedCross consecutively trained the global model across multiple clients in a roundrobin fashion.…”
Section: E Federated Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 More and more research works in medical image segmentation involve an FL scheme [211]. Recently, Xu et al [212] introduced in a new federated cross-learning segmentation approach that handles data that are not independently and identically distributed. Unlike the conventional FL methods that combine multiple individually trained local models on a server node, the proposed method named FedCross consecutively trained the global model across multiple clients in a roundrobin fashion.…”
Section: E Federated Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The challenge of data heterogeneity and domain shifting was recently tackled in novel ways by, for example, federated disentanglement learning via disentangling the parameter space into shape and appearance [6] and automated federated averaging based on Dirichlet distribution [22]. Dynamic Re-Weighting mechanisms [12], federated cross ensemble learning [24], and label-agnostic (mixed labels) unified FL formed by a mixture of the client distributions [21] have been recently proposed to relax an unrealistic assumption that each client's training set will be annotated similarly and therefore follows the same image supervision level during the training of an image segmentation model. Although extensive research has been carried out on FL, there is still a need for methods to enable the development of more generalized FL models for clinical use which can effectively deal with statistical heterogeneity in weight aggregation, communication efficiency, and privacy with security.…”
Section: Federated Servermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was demonstrated to enhance the local models' performance following adaptation. The authors in [104] applied a Federated Cross Learning (FedCross) algorithm on prostate cancer MRI segmentation using the same datasets as in [99].…”
Section: ) Fl Applications Associated With Prostatementioning
confidence: 99%