2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2022.108441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Federated Neural Collaborative Filtering

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We adopt the same hyper-parameter setting for NCF-based methods with two kinds of training methods, including the same number of latent factors, learning rate, number of MLP layers, etc. For MF methods, we refer to the results from [14,32]. It is worth mentioning that we are not attempting to tune a new state-ofthe-art recommendation performance, which is a mission better suited to much more complicated neural networks.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We adopt the same hyper-parameter setting for NCF-based methods with two kinds of training methods, including the same number of latent factors, learning rate, number of MLP layers, etc. For MF methods, we refer to the results from [14,32]. It is worth mentioning that we are not attempting to tune a new state-ofthe-art recommendation performance, which is a mission better suited to much more complicated neural networks.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main objective of the TR layer is to learn an unknown parameter , a worker's ability to complete any specific task. Pertaining to our model requirements, we adopt a NCF approach to learn user ability because of its ability to learn implicit preferences and also because it has been extensively studied for and applied to the reality recommender systems [25][26][27].…”
Section: Tropt-netmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This results in users with strong privacy demands are not satisfied, whereas users with weak privacy demands pay an unnecessary recommendation performance price. Third, every user's privacy demands are not static, and traditional FedRec systems mainly focus on privacy protection in the training stage, making it difficult for users to modify privacy settings [34,36]. Consequently, the balance between utility and privacy is not flexible for users in traditional FedRec systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%