2016
DOI: 10.7146/mediekultur.v32i60.21261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feed the dogs: The case of humanitarian communication in social media

Abstract: In this paper, we address negative aspects of the interplay between networked media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, environment and animal nonprofits attracted more donors per organization than any other program service area. This may be due to donors having a stronger emotional attachment to animal welfare than other causes represented during Omaha Gives (e.g., Knudsen & Bajde, 2016). We also find that health-related organizations raised fewer donations from fewer donors on average compared to human services.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, environment and animal nonprofits attracted more donors per organization than any other program service area. This may be due to donors having a stronger emotional attachment to animal welfare than other causes represented during Omaha Gives (e.g., Knudsen & Bajde, 2016). We also find that health-related organizations raised fewer donations from fewer donors on average compared to human services.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Saxton and Wang (2014) find health-related organizations receive significantly more donations than youth and human services, and arts organizations. Similarly, Knudsen and Bajde (2016) identify a strong social media effect on the success of a fundraising campaign by an animal welfare nonprofit in Denmark. Thus, we expect preference for a cause may affect donors’ inclination to support some program service areas over others during Omaha Gives:…”
Section: Review Of Prior Researchmentioning
confidence: 97%