2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2020.106144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feedback control law of solar sail with variable surface reflectivity at Sun-Earth collinear equilibrium points

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assuming a higher-performance sail, with a lightness number of 0.02, (corresponding to the design value of the Solar Orbiter mission with a near-term technology level), the warning time increases to about 80 minutes for an average solar wind speed and about 40 minutes for fast streams. Since L 1 -type AEPs are known to be intrinsically unstable [33,42], as is confirmed by the linear stability analysis reported in the remainder of this section, their maintenance requires a suitable control system to be used.…”
Section: Mathematical Preliminaries and Mission Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Assuming a higher-performance sail, with a lightness number of 0.02, (corresponding to the design value of the Solar Orbiter mission with a near-term technology level), the warning time increases to about 80 minutes for an average solar wind speed and about 40 minutes for fast streams. Since L 1 -type AEPs are known to be intrinsically unstable [33,42], as is confirmed by the linear stability analysis reported in the remainder of this section, their maintenance requires a suitable control system to be used.…”
Section: Mathematical Preliminaries and Mission Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The problem of generation and stabilization of an L 1 -type AEP by means of a propellantless propulsive system has been discussed by several authors [33,39,40,41,42]. The main contribution of this paper may be summarized in the following points.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of attitude control, although there exists a variety of conventional attitude control methods such as reaction wheels, control moment gyroscopes (CMGs) and thrusters, these methods cannot effectively control the attitude of solar sails due to the mass limitation and the required long mission lifetime [1,3,11]. Currently, several methods for attitude control for solar sails exist [17], including the control vane method [18], gimbaled masses method [19,20], sliding masses method, shifted wings method, tilted wings method and billowed wings method for rigid solar sail and sail film with controllable reflectivity method for non-rigid solar sail [3,[21][22][23]. Qu et al also proposed a control method utilizing individually controllable elements to control each sail [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of propellantless propulsion systems in the interplanetary space, such as photonic solar sails [1,2,3,4,5], Electric Solar Wind Sails (E-sails) [6,7,8,9,10], or magnetic sails (MagSails) [11,12,13], is a fascinating option in view of the opportunity they offer to obtain long-lasting missions. A common peculiarity of these propulsion systems is in the dependence of the thrust magnitude on the distance from the Sun.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%