Suckling rats were subjected to deprivation periods of 6-8 hr. Intake following deprivation was greater in deprived than in nondeprived sucklings, but did not increase with increasing deprivation. Gastric loads of NaCl solutions depressed subsequent intake; 3% NaCl was more effective than .9% NaCl. Other gastric loads of varying osmotic and caloric value also depressed subsequent intake. In order of increasing effectiveness in depressing intake, the gastric* loads were protein hydrolystate, heavy cream, water, milk, lactose, glucose, and corn oil. Effectiveness was unrelated to osmotic or caloric value of the load. Gastric fill and, possibly, some property of carbohydrate appear to be important determinants of satiety in the suckling rat.The controls of food intake in the neonate have drawn considerable attention within the past few years. Houpt and Epstein (1973) have shown that food deprivation stimulates subsequent food intake in suckling rats as early as the first postnatal day of life. Activity is also stimulated by deprivation in the suckling as in the adult rat . Houpt and Epstein, using the glucose analogue 2-deoxy-Dglucose (2DG), and Lytle, Moorcroft, and Campbell (1971), using insulin, have shown that glucoprivation does not stimulate food intake in preweanling rats. These studies indicate that, although the suckling rat possesses one adult control of food intake-the ability to compensate for food deprivation with a subsequent increase in intake-it lacks another adult control--eating in response to a lack of metabolizable glucose. In this respect suckling rats resemble adult rats with lateral hypothalamic lesions, as suggested by Rozin (1969) andRozin (1971).Those factors that depress food intake in 1 The technical assistance of Jack A. Cochrane and the statistical advice of Dale Van Vleck were appreciated.2 K. A. Houpt was a Scholar of the Pennsylvania Plan to Develop Scientists in Medical Research, University of Pennsylvania. Requests for reprints should be sent to K.