2018
DOI: 10.5194/acp-18-247-2018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feedback effects of boundary-layer meteorological factors on cumulative explosive growth of PM<sub>2.5</sub> during winter heavy pollution episodes in Beijing from 2013 to 2016

Abstract: Abstract. In January 2013, February 2014, December 2015 and December 2016 to 10 January 2017, 12 persistent heavy aerosol pollution episodes (HPEs) occurred in Beijing, which received special attention from the public. During the HPEs, the precise cause of PM2.5 explosive growth (mass concentration at least doubled in several hours to 10 h) is uncertain. Here, we analyzed and estimated relative contributions of boundary-layer meteorological factors to such growth, using ground and vertical meteorological data.… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
149
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 243 publications
(163 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
12
149
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The formation of the four haze episodes all started from a wind direction change from the north to the south when aerosol species increased simultaneously at ground level and 260 m. However, we noticed that aerosol species at 260 m showed more rapid increases during the initial stages of haze formation leading to the ratios 260m/ground higher than 1. These results supported the important role of regional transport in early formation of haze episodes (Zhong et al, ). The NR‐PM 1 mass concentration gradually increased from ~20 to ~120 μg/m 3 in 4 days during Ep4 (Figure a; marked as Ep4 in Figure ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The formation of the four haze episodes all started from a wind direction change from the north to the south when aerosol species increased simultaneously at ground level and 260 m. However, we noticed that aerosol species at 260 m showed more rapid increases during the initial stages of haze formation leading to the ratios 260m/ground higher than 1. These results supported the important role of regional transport in early formation of haze episodes (Zhong et al, ). The NR‐PM 1 mass concentration gradually increased from ~20 to ~120 μg/m 3 in 4 days during Ep4 (Figure a; marked as Ep4 in Figure ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Numerous studies also indicate the combination between meteorological conditions and air pollution creates appropriate environment for microbial community structure and abundance, and viral infectivity (Jones and Harrison, 2004). Zhong et al (2018) argue that static meteorological conditions may explain the increase of PM 2.5 . In general, bacterial communities during aerosol pollution are influenced by bacterial adaptive mechanisms, particle composition, and meteorological conditions.…”
Section: Infected Individuals Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies also indicate the role of meteorological conditions in pollution development that creates Coccia M. (2020) Two mechanisms for accelerated diffusion of COVID-19 outbreaks in regions with high intensity of population and polluting industrialization: the air pollution-to-human and human-to-human transmission dynamics appropriate conditions for microbial community structure and abundance, and viral infectivity (Jones and Harrison, 2004). Zhong et al (2018) argue that static meteorological conditions may explain the increase of PM2.5. In general, bacterial communities during aerosol pollution are influenced by bacterial adaptive mechanisms, particle composition, and meteorological conditions.…”
Section: Why Did This Virus Spread So Rapidly In Italy?mentioning
confidence: 99%