2019
DOI: 10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0875
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feedback on research results to healthcare professionals in the context of HIV

Abstract: Objective: Reporting the feedback on the results of a multicenter research for healthcare professionals that attend people living with HIV and AIDS in a Specialized Healthcare Center at Belém, state of Pará, Brazil. Method: Case report of the presentation and interpretation of research results, in 2015, totaling 25 participating professionals. The visual resource used was a data projector. Results: Participants reported the importance of the initiative, since, even though it is their right, feedback on resea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In view of this reality, it should be noted that the results from quality scientific studies must go beyond disclosure to the academic community. They must reach the participants (3) , who are more than the data sources and are characterized as actors with the potential of transforming the reality studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In view of this reality, it should be noted that the results from quality scientific studies must go beyond disclosure to the academic community. They must reach the participants (3) , who are more than the data sources and are characterized as actors with the potential of transforming the reality studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, Palmeira et al, 2019 (3) highlights that, when reviewing the literature on the feedback of the result of researches and experiences in the LILACS, MEDLINE and BDEnf databases, significant gaps were noticed in academic publications that explained how the researchers discussed the results produced after conducting the studies. Only two articles were found, both from between 2013 and 2016.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%