1986
DOI: 10.1109/tac.1986.1104417
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feedback stabilization of linear autonomous time lag systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
64
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 202 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
64
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Under the infinite dimensional systems setting, references [5,6] studied continuous-time systems with a more general delay structure in both state and input than that studied in references [4,11]. Applying linear transformations, the stabilization problem for systems with single input delay was investigated in [12]. An elegant solution to the standard H ∞ control of systems with single input delay has been presented in references [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the infinite dimensional systems setting, references [5,6] studied continuous-time systems with a more general delay structure in both state and input than that studied in references [4,11]. Applying linear transformations, the stabilization problem for systems with single input delay was investigated in [12]. An elegant solution to the standard H ∞ control of systems with single input delay has been presented in references [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A linearized version of the feeding system and combustion chamber equations, assuming nonsteady flow, is given as follows [12]: (t) the instantaneous pressure at the place in the feeding line where the capacitance representing the elasticity is located,p 1 the value of p 1 in steady operation and p =p 1 −p the injector pressure drop in steady operation, p 0 is the regulated gas pressure for the pressure supply, P =p/(2 p), γ is the pressure exponent of the pressure dependence of the combustion process taking place during the time lag, ξ represents the fractional length for the pressure supply, J is the inertia parameter of the line, and E is the elasticity parameter of the line. Guided by [12], we take u = ( p 0 − p 1 )/(2 p) as a control variable and adopt the following representative numerical values: ξ = 0.5, γ = 1, P = 1, J = 2, E = 1, and h = 1. Letting x(t) = [ϕ(t) μ 1 (t) μ(t) ψ(t)] T , the system (21) reduces to (1) with the delay size h. It is noted that the RHC proposed in [6] cannot be applied to this system because we can not find any stability-guaranteeing terminal weighting matrices using the LMI condition proposed therein.…”
Section: A Numerical Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have investigated both continuous-time and discretetime methods for time-delay compensation proposed by other investigators [34,43] and have recommended the method proposed by Day and Hsia [34] for the design of a suitable control law. Other time-delay compensation methods that may be of interest to control of civil engineering structures are: linear predictor control [41,44,45] [58]. SOME NEW RESULTS ON COMPENSATION OF TIME DELAY To date signi"cant progress has been made in the compensation of time-delay for controlled structures.…”
Section: U(t)"gn X(t! )#Gnmentioning
confidence: 99%