1988
DOI: 10.1016/0165-3806(88)90217-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feeding behavior in mammals: corticobulbar projection is reorganized during conversion from sucking to chewing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…17,18 This ororhythmic motor behavior is primarily controlled by the suck central pattern generator (sCPG), which includes bilateral internuncial circuits within the pontine and medullary reticular formation. 19,20 The minimal circuitry for ororhythmic activity resides between the trigeminal motor nucleus and the facial nucleus in the brainstem. 19 Thus, suck represents a complex sensorimotor behavior that can provide valuable insights into the integrity of the central nervous system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17,18 This ororhythmic motor behavior is primarily controlled by the suck central pattern generator (sCPG), which includes bilateral internuncial circuits within the pontine and medullary reticular formation. 19,20 The minimal circuitry for ororhythmic activity resides between the trigeminal motor nucleus and the facial nucleus in the brainstem. 19 Thus, suck represents a complex sensorimotor behavior that can provide valuable insights into the integrity of the central nervous system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above findings (Iriki et al, 1988) are interesting, given that guinea pigs used in the experiments, are born with erupted teeth, which show wear from intra-uterine grinding. However, neonatal guinea pigs do not feed or chew until weaning, indicating that tooth eruption is not sufficient to produce chewing.…”
Section: Tooth Eruption and The Transition From Suckling To Chewingmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…There is also debate among scientists about the relationship between suckling and mastication. Iriki, et al (Iriki et al, 1988) have demonstrated that suckling and mastication www.intechopen.com are represented at anatomically distinct cortical sites (Fig. 4).…”
Section: Licking and Sucklingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that motor commands to these masticatory muscles change in parallel with the postnatal development of the orofacial musculoskeletal structures. Since the TMNs provide the nal motor output to jaw-closing and jaw-opening muscles 29,30 , the common opinion in the eld is that the input-output properties of these motoneurons change in line with the alteration of motor commands 4,19,31 .…”
Section: Postnatal Development Of Synaptic Transmission From Premotormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This neural architecture indicates that the neural circuits including premotor neurons and motoneurons are involved in controlling masticatory muscle activities via ascending and descending inputs during jaw movement. The properties of these neural circuits differ among postnatal periods 19 because feeding behavior of mammals changes substantially from suckling to chewing during development, which is accompanied by the formation of the oral and facial musculoskeletal system during the early postnatal period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%