2014
DOI: 10.1111/aas.12262
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feeling bullied at the workplace

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7 To develop strategies to reduce disruptive behaviour in the OR, it is important to establish the scope of the problem and to ascertain who is at higher risk of being exposed. Previous investigations in the OR have had methodological limitations relating to sampling frames, survey tool development, and statistical methodology.. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] Appropriate tools to measure exposure to disruptive behaviour have only recently been created 21,24,25 and previous studies have not examined disruptive behaviour in a large international cohort of OR clinicians. There is also limited data on the socio-demographic predictors of exposure to disruptive behaviour.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 To develop strategies to reduce disruptive behaviour in the OR, it is important to establish the scope of the problem and to ascertain who is at higher risk of being exposed. Previous investigations in the OR have had methodological limitations relating to sampling frames, survey tool development, and statistical methodology.. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] Appropriate tools to measure exposure to disruptive behaviour have only recently been created 21,24,25 and previous studies have not examined disruptive behaviour in a large international cohort of OR clinicians. There is also limited data on the socio-demographic predictors of exposure to disruptive behaviour.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in the healthcare setting have similarly relied on unsolicited reporting 49,50 or have used tools generating scores with underverified psychometric properties. 4,[6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] A number of studies assessed exposure using a single self-labeling question. 4,6,10,12,18 This involves directly asking respondents how often they have been a victim of any disruptive behavior, without reference to particular examples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31,32 The more sources of evidence collected, the stronger the claim of validity. Some of the previous studies made no efforts to show the validity of their scores, 18 provided evidence of validity solely based on content 4,10,14,16,53,54 or provided evidence based on 2 or 3 sources of evidence. 13,19 Only one other study presented 4 of the 5 sources of evidence to support the use of their scales 25 but this study did not focus on the operative context.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations