1988
DOI: 10.1016/0749-5978(88)90033-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Felt dispensability in groups of coactors: The effects of shared responsibility and explicit anonymity on cognitive effort

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Group researchers have long focused on identifying interventions to reduce or eliminate social loafing. The identification and attribution of individual member contributions is one such intervention that has been widely suggested as having the potential to reduce social loafing (Michener and DeLamater 1999, Parks and Sanna 1999, Weldon and Mustari 1988. In particular, the pooling of group contributions without accurately attributing individual contributions (i.e., using the equality principle for distributing rewards) is likely to lead to social loafing and reduced performance.…”
Section: Providing Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Group researchers have long focused on identifying interventions to reduce or eliminate social loafing. The identification and attribution of individual member contributions is one such intervention that has been widely suggested as having the potential to reduce social loafing (Michener and DeLamater 1999, Parks and Sanna 1999, Weldon and Mustari 1988. In particular, the pooling of group contributions without accurately attributing individual contributions (i.e., using the equality principle for distributing rewards) is likely to lead to social loafing and reduced performance.…”
Section: Providing Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Students who shared a judgement-making task with other members felt more dispensable than students working alone or in pairs causing them to increase their levels of social loafing (Weldon & Mustari 1988) Arousal Reduction (Harkins & Szymanski 1989) …”
Section: Social Loafing Is Reduced When Individuals Believe Their Inpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…productivity [59, see also 4]. Over the years, researchers have focused on identifying factors that reduce or eliminate social loafing, and have consistently suggested that having individual performances identifiable (i.e., identifiability [32]) and evaluable (i.e., evaluability [27]) appears to eliminate social loafing [48,53,78]. This expands the above question as follows: Is there a way to make individual performances identifiable and evaluable without sacrificing anonymity?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Weldon and Mustari [78] point out that the absence of performance information creates two major motivational problems: (1) social control of behavior by rewarding an appropriate performance behavior (using monetary or nonmonetary rewards such as social recognition or attention) is lost; and (2) the equality principle is used in distributing rewards after pooling contributions. Since performance information can provide not only appraisal information, which refers to information about how the group members' performances are being identified and evaluated, but also referent information, which refers to information that guides which behaviors are most appropriate for achieving the desired goal [7], it can serve as a cue to regulate appropriate behavior and as a (social) reward to motivate performance [6,58].…”
Section: Effects Of Evaluabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation