2020
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abd0310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Female hunters of the early Americas

Abstract: Sexual division of labor with females as gatherers and males as hunters is a major empirical regularity of hunter-gatherer ethnography, suggesting an ancestral behavioral pattern. We present an archeological discovery and meta-analysis that challenge the man-the-hunter hypothesis. Excavations at the Andean highland site of Wilamaya Patjxa reveal a 9000-year-old human burial (WMP6) associated with a hunting toolkit of stone projectile points and animal processing tools. Osteological, proteomic, and isotopic ana… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
83
0
8

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 151 publications
4
83
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…However, several scholars have theorized that such division of labor would have been less pronounced or even altogether absent among Paleolithic HG (Haas et al, 2020 & Power, 2015;Haas et al, 2020;Khorasani & Lee, 2020;Noss & Hewlett, 2001;Waguespack, 2005). Especially relevant to the Paleolithic is the potential participation of females in large game hunting (Brink, 2008;Haas et al, 2020) in driving large animals to a trap where their movement can be curtailed (Churchill, 1993) or in driving them to expecting male hunters (Waguespack, 2005); methods that provide the opportunity for communal hunting (Lee, 1979, p. 234).…”
Section: Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, several scholars have theorized that such division of labor would have been less pronounced or even altogether absent among Paleolithic HG (Haas et al, 2020 & Power, 2015;Haas et al, 2020;Khorasani & Lee, 2020;Noss & Hewlett, 2001;Waguespack, 2005). Especially relevant to the Paleolithic is the potential participation of females in large game hunting (Brink, 2008;Haas et al, 2020) in driving large animals to a trap where their movement can be curtailed (Churchill, 1993) or in driving them to expecting male hunters (Waguespack, 2005); methods that provide the opportunity for communal hunting (Lee, 1979, p. 234).…”
Section: Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…or thrusting weapons, is a plausible origin of sex difference in throwing velocity and accuracy and upper body strength. However, the evidence that is available (not much) suggests that both males and females participated in hunts even through the terminal Pleistocene and into the Holocene (Estalrrich and Rosas 2015;Haas et al 2020;Kuhn and Stiner 2006), as we see in many large-bodied social carnivores today (lions, hyenas, hunting dogs, etc.). It is critical to note that Pleistocene Homo bodies (male and female) were generally more robust than contemporary humans, and thus, a late Pleistocene female Homo may have been able to throw a javelin, or thrust a spear, as effectively as many contemporary human males (the baseline used for assumptions about male-female differences in hunting ability).…”
Section: Hunting?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adovasio et al 2016;Cooney Williams and Janik 2018;Fritz et al 2016). Females also likely participated regularly in big-game hunting amongst hunter-gatherers in the Americas (Haas et al 2020) suggesting that we should be cautious about interpreting art related to hunting as also relating to male artists and/or learners. At least in Upper Palaeolithic Europe and Australia, children were also part of heterogeneous groups involved in cave exploration and cave art (Garcia et al 1990;Romano et al 2019), potentially sometimes on their own (Roveland 2000).…”
Section: Children Making Marks Art and Tracksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if stone tool manufacture is recorded as a predominantly male activity ethnographically (see discussion in Stapert 2007), we cannot extrapolate a division of labour into the archaeological stone tool record on the basis of ethnography alone (e.g. see Haas et al 2020), and especially not in relation to children.…”
Section: Embedding Children In Social Worldsmentioning
confidence: 99%