1982
DOI: 10.1037/h0077904
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Female regulation and choice in the copulatory behavior of montane voles (Microtus montanus).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Females of rodent species with multiple intromissions often prefer a slower pace of copulation than is imposed under male control (e.g. McClintock & Adler, 1978;Gilman et al, 1979;Erskine & Baum, 1982;Fadem & Barfield, 1982;Webster et al, 1982;Huck & Lisk, 1985;Martinez & Paredes, 2001). Results of our analyses provide the first comparative evidence that males are selected to increase the pace of copulation in response to increasing sperm competition level.…”
Section: Sperm Competition and Pace Of Copulationmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Females of rodent species with multiple intromissions often prefer a slower pace of copulation than is imposed under male control (e.g. McClintock & Adler, 1978;Gilman et al, 1979;Erskine & Baum, 1982;Fadem & Barfield, 1982;Webster et al, 1982;Huck & Lisk, 1985;Martinez & Paredes, 2001). Results of our analyses provide the first comparative evidence that males are selected to increase the pace of copulation in response to increasing sperm competition level.…”
Section: Sperm Competition and Pace Of Copulationmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…McClintock & Adler, 1978; Gilman et al. , 1979; Erskine & Baum, 1982; Fadem & Barfield, 1982; Webster et al. , 1982; Huck & Lisk, 1985; Martinez & Paredes, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The stimulus animal that was defined as the "stranger" had not previously encountered the experimental animal, but was otherwise matched to the partner in terms of age, size, and reproductive status. Tethering, which restricts each stimulus animal's movements to its own chamber, has been used in many experiments assessing social and reproductive behavior, and is reported to cause minimal disturbance to the experimental and stimulus animals (Webster et al 1982). The 3-h preference tests were monitored using time-lapse videotaping with a 12: 1 temporal reduction and scored by an experimentally uninformed observer for the following: (i) duration of physical contact between the experimental subject and stimulus animals, (ii) general activity of experimental animals, measured as the frequency of entry into the neutral cage, and (iii) frequency of agonistic behavior displayed by the experimental animal, including the incidence of threats, attacks, or fights.…”
Section: Behavioral Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wooden barrier in the central compartment was used to isolate the three compartments by blocking the runway tubes. The stimulus voles were tethered in the choice compartments by disposable nylon collars, which were connected to a horizontal chain suspended above the top of end compartment (see details in Webster et al 1982), and they could move freely within the choice compartment but not outside. The nylon collar, not stress mask, was used only once.…”
Section: Apparatusmentioning
confidence: 99%